It's the Paradox of Our Age the More Human Rights Laws We Have, the Fewer Rights We Enjoy. and I Blame Cherie

Daily Mail (London), November 16, 2007 | Go to article overview

It's the Paradox of Our Age the More Human Rights Laws We Have, the Fewer Rights We Enjoy. and I Blame Cherie


Byline: TOM UTLEY

HOW many members of the Cabinet ever dreamt, in their days as studentactivists, that one day they'd belong to a government seriously proposing toallow Britons to be imprisoned without trial for as long as two months?

How many thought they'd find themselves voting to restrict the right to trialby jury? Or systematically building up a DNA database of innocent witnesses andvictims of crimes including 150,000 children?

Did Jacqui Smith or Peter Hain, in their idealistic youth, imagine themselvescalling for compulsory identity cards or demanding that Britons should be madeto answer 53 questions about their travel plans before they could be allowed toleave for a day-trip to Boulogne?

Did the young Gordon Brown see himself rising in the Commons to announce themost Draconian restrictions on freedom of movement in Britain's peacetimehistorybody and baggage searches at railway stations, exclusion zones for cars in towncentres, a ban on underground car parks in shopping centres?

Of course not. Indeed, most of the Cabinet cut their political teeth at studentrallies denouncing authoritarian foreign regimes for behaving in exactly theway that they themselves are behaving now.

This sort of thing could never happen here in Britain, they thoughtexcept in Northern Ireland, where most of them blamed the Troubles onsuccessive governments' refusal to surrender to the 'legitimate demands' of theIRA.

Outrageous No, Britain was a free country (for reasons they never thought veryhard about) and as far as they were concerned, it always would be. What theywanted was the same liberties for everybody in the whole wide world.

'Freedom and democracy for allregardless of race, nationality or creed!' they cried. And there lies the greatparadox of modern politics: it is precisely because their ambitions knew nonational boundaries that freedom and democracy are under greater threat inthese islands than at any time since the war.

I blame Cherie Blair. That may sound like an outrageous charge to lay againstone not-very-remarkable woman. But the more you think about the restrictionsnow being placed upon us, the more you realise how much they owe to theaccident of her choice of career.

When Tony Blair came to office in 1997, human rights law was the comparativelyarcane preoccupation of a handful of specialist lawyers. The tragedy forBritain's freedom and democracy is that by the time he left No 10, it was oneof the cornerstones of our constitution. Would Mr Blair have been so keen onincorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into British law if ithadn't been one of the great enthusiasms of his barrister wife? In the dyingdays of the Major government, I don't remember any great popular demand forlegislation on human rights, either in the Labour Party or the country atlarge.

It may have annoyed a few lawyers that it used to take an average of five yearsto get an action into the European Court of Human Rights, but the rest of usweren't much bothered about that. We were much more concerned about ourchildren's education, the cost of living and the state of the public services.

Yet Mr Blair made human rights one of his top priorities, pushing through theHuman Rights Act (HRA) only a year after he came to power. The only trulyconvincing explanation, surely, is that he shared his life with a lawyer whowas deeply interested in the subject (and who went on to co-found the humanrights specialists Matrix Chambers).

I say the Act was a tragedy for British democracy because it removed from usthe right to make and amend our own laws, through our representatives inParliament, and handed it over instead to unelected judges.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

It's the Paradox of Our Age the More Human Rights Laws We Have, the Fewer Rights We Enjoy. and I Blame Cherie
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.