Accident or Suicide? Single-Vehicle Car Accidents and the Intent Hypothesis

By Peck, Dennis L.; Warner, Kenneth | Adolescence, Summer 1995 | Go to article overview

Accident or Suicide? Single-Vehicle Car Accidents and the Intent Hypothesis


Peck, Dennis L., Warner, Kenneth, Adolescence


INTRODUCTION

The number of vehicular deaths recorded in the United States total 48,800, 46,620, 43,980, and 41,040 for 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992, respectively (Monthly Vital Statistics Reports August 28, 1991; May 28, 1992; June 30, 1993). It is hypothesized by analysts of fatal accidents that many of the deaths attributed to vehicle car accidents, especially single-vehicle car, may result from suicidal intent. However, the information necessary to conclude that the driver's intent was to terminate his/her life is generally unavailable. The questions germane to this project are: (1) What criteria can be used to determine whether suicide was the intent? (2) How can death by automobile crash be determined a suicide?

In an interesting analysis of suicide attempters, Lester and Beck (1980) suggest that the overall effect of suicide intent is highly correlated with choice of method, a finding supported in part by Peck's (1984) analysis of the lethality of suicide method and suicide notes. Although car accidents are not formally recognized as a method of suicide, their lethality is substantial in terms of the degree of risk-taking involved. The crucial factor is the strength of the driver's intent to die.

Single-car accident drivers differ from multiple-car accident drivers in that the former tend to be younger, unmarried, are generally at fault, most have prior convictions for traffic violations, and were driving at excessive speed (Schmidt, Perlin, Towns, Fisher, & Shaffer 1972). But such characteristics should not be used to mask the fact that death by automobile offers a unique opportunity for concealment of suicide intent (MacDonald 1965). For example, the results of a study of fatally injured (N = 182) and nonfatally injured (N = 96) drivers involved in vehicular crashes conducted in Baltimore (Schmidt, Shaffer, Zlotowitz, & Fisher 1977) led the investigators to conclude that 1.7% (n = 3) of all fatal crashes were suicides, 2.7% of fatal single-car crashes were so identified, and 1% of the nonfatal crashes were thought to be suicide attempts. Vehicular fatalities that are suicides vary from 1.6% to 5% (Schmidt et al., 1977). These figures lead to considerable speculation that a significant albeit unknown proportion of vehicular deaths classified as accidents are in fact suicides. As Schmidt et al. (1977, p. 175) argue, the single-car, single-occupant fatal crash is especially suspect.

The work of Selzer and Payne (1962) supports the theory that some automobile accidents are suicides, especially among alcoholic males who are motivated by an unconscious, self-destructive impulse. The further suggestion by Schmidt et al. (1977), that significant personality differences can be identified when accident victims are compared to suicides, has value for understanding the automobile as a method of choice for suicide.

The one-vehicle car crash creates a special problem in the classification of death because the law states that suicidal intent must be proven. Reasons for this legal mandate relate to other legal issues, insurance claims, family concerns, and the stigma attached to suicide. Identification of the criteria to be used for objectively evaluating suicidal behavior versus accidents is important for the understanding of the nature of this problem as well as for other important social reasons (Scheppele 1991). Moreover, the possible misclassification of death has important implications for our knowledge of this problem.

Lethality of Method and the Intent Hypothesis

The determination of suicide requires the establishment of intent. Intent to die thus serves as a starting point, but as Douglas (1967) notes, intention is an ambiguous term. Often investigators are persuaded to accept as fact what is referred to by Douglas (1967, p. 189) as the "social imputation of causality of social action," or something which lies outside the physical environment. According to Douglas (1967, p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Accident or Suicide? Single-Vehicle Car Accidents and the Intent Hypothesis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.