Prodigy to Appeal State Court Decision

By Webb, William | Editor & Publisher, June 24, 1995 | Go to article overview

Prodigy to Appeal State Court Decision


Webb, William, Editor & Publisher


PRODIGY WILL APPEAL a state court decision holding the company liable for the content of its subscribers' electronic messages.

New York Supreme Court Judge Stuart L. Ain, in Mineola, ruled that Prodigy acted substantially as a publisher in allowing a bulletin board message that accused the investment banking firm Stratton Oakmont Inc. of criminal conduct.

The decision clears the way for a $200 million libel suit filed by Stratton Oakmont against Prodigy.

However, according to Brian Ek, director of communication at Prodigy, the lawsuit is "incidental" to the more fundamental issue of who is responsible legally for material posted on computer bulletin boards.

Prodigy, seeking guidelines under which the company can operate without threat of lawsuit, is looking for a higher-level decision than the state court to act as a precedent, Ek said.

Ain agreed with the operating principle of most online bulletin board and chat groups, which exercise little or no control over the content of subscribers' messages.

"Computer bulletin boards should generally be regarded in the same context as bookstores, libraries and network affiliates," he wrote. That is, they generally cannot be held liable for what they disseminate.

But the judge differentiated Prodigy from services such as CompuServe, which won a precedent-setting 1991 decision that limited the right to sue for online defamation.

He said Prodigy's decision to bar messages that contain obscenity, slurs and personal attacks constituted editorial control. Prodigy's software automatically returns messages that contain obscenities, and an alert button lets users call a system operator to look over other messages that might be offensive.

"Prodigy's conscious choice, to gain the benefits of editorial control, has opened it up to a greater liability than CompuServe and other computer networks that make no such choice," wrote Ain.

Is any form of editorial control too much?

"We believe very strongly that we were penalized for acting responsibly," said Ek. "Newspapers are facing the same thing if they offer bulletin boards or chat, which most of them do."

Other online services screen for obscenities but have not publicized their policy as much as Prodigy has.

Ain cited Prodigy's 1990 marketing copy: "We make no apology for pursuing a value system that reflects the culture of the millions of American families we aspire to serve. Certainly no responsible newspaper does less."

In fact, Prodigy does less, according to Ek, because the service takes no responsibility for factual content and never claimed such responsibility.

Prodigy now says it has abandoned those early claims that compared it to a newspaper.

Despite the judge's argument to the contrary, the decision potentially impacts every online service, including Prodigy's competitors, CompuServe and America Online.

"They are alarmed by it, they are in full support of our appeal, and you will see them issue a press release very soon to that effect," Ek said. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Prodigy to Appeal State Court Decision
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.