The Impact of Agenda Conflict on Policy Formulation and Implementation: The Case of Gun Control

By Vizzard, William J. | Public Administration Review, July-August 1995 | Go to article overview

The Impact of Agenda Conflict on Policy Formulation and Implementation: The Case of Gun Control


Vizzard, William J., Public Administration Review


With passage of the Brady Bill and subsequent focus on assault weapons, the issue of gun control has returned to the public spotlight. Both opponents and advocates of gun control have used the heightened interest and increased media attention to advance their cases. For those familiar with the history of gun control in the United States, the current process invokes a certain sense of deja vu. In addition to having the most lenient, but complex, firearms laws in the industrialized world, the United States has been unique in the level and duration of controversy over gun policy (Zimring and Hawkins, 1987; Kopel, 1992). Some have viewed this as resulting from the role that guns played in American history (Hofstadter, 1970). An examination of the policy history reveals more about the American political process than about our romance with guns. It is a history that confirms our deep commitment to pluralism and incrementalism, while raising questions regarding their utility. Rather than a politics-administration dichotomy, one discovers complex entanglements of policy formulation and implementation and a conflict over symbols and language that has produced a stalemate resembling an iron triangle in effect if not design.

History

The history of gun control can be divided into at least five distinct eras beginning with the passage of the Sullivan Law in New York in 1909 and ending with the passage of the Brady Bill in 1993. A sixth era is added by some researchers to cover the efforts of southern states to deny firearms to blacks after the Civil War (Kates, 1979).

Gun control, as a policy applicable to the general population, began in 1909 with New York State's Sullivan Law, which mandated permits for the possession of handguns. Passed in an era when the prohibition of drugs and alcoholic beverages was being widely advocated, the law was a result of these influences, as well as fear of crime and the increased population of new immigrants (Sugarmann, 1992; 171-179). New York police have used the law to deny handgun access to all but the most influential citizens, particularly in New York City. This highly restrictive approach to implementation has provided a model for control advocates and a rallying point for opponents (Vizzard, 1993; 134).

Federal Government Enters the Field

After a 1927 effort to control interstate shipment of handguns by prohibiting their shipment by mail, but not common carrier, Congress first addressed the gun issue more seriously in 1934. Attorney General Homer Cummings proposed a bill that would control all firearms, other than sporting rifles and shotguns, through a transfer tax and registration scheme modeled after the Harrison Narcotics Act. In both House and Senate hearings on the bill, it was opposed by the NRA, numerous sportsmen's associations, and the firearms industry (Leff and Leff, 1981).

A compromise was reached that excluded handguns and semi-automatic rifles from the bill (Sugarmann, 1992; 33). The National Firearms Act (NFA) was enacted in 1934 and required registration and a transfer tax only on so-called gangster-type weapons, including machine guns, silencers, and sawed-off rifles and shotguns. Although the bill had the backing of the administration and a few powerful members of Congress, southern and western lawmakers generally opposed controls and little national attention appears to have been focused on the issue (Vizzard, 1993; 174-176).

The administration continued to pursue more restrictive legislation under the interstate commerce authority. In 1938, Congress finally passed the Federal Firearms Act (FFA), which required licensing of gun dealers and their maintenance of sales records but lacked mechanics for enforcement. Hearing records indicate that the bill was primarily drafted by the NRA as an effort to prevent more restrictive legislation (Kennett and Anderson, 1975; 192-193; Sugarmann, 1992; 30). Crime rates began a decline in 1934 that would continue for almost three decades, and the limited public and congressional interest in gun control abated. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Impact of Agenda Conflict on Policy Formulation and Implementation: The Case of Gun Control
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.