Traditional Toleration and Modern Pluralism: The Case of "Orthodox Europe."(Transcript)

By Dutu, Alexandru | East European Quarterly, Summer 1995 | Go to article overview

Traditional Toleration and Modern Pluralism: The Case of "Orthodox Europe."(Transcript)


Dutu, Alexandru, East European Quarterly


Three different aspects will be briefly discussed in my paper starting from current opinions and stereotypes that raise three major questions: does there exist a specific political unit called "Orthodox Europe?"; did the Church and State collaborate permanently in this part of our continent?; is Orthodox traditionalism hostile to political pluralism?

1.

It is often stated nowadays that Eastern Europe went on a separate way after the Great Schism of 1054 and it is quite fashionable to discuss political matters in more sophisticated terms that would appeal to religious feelings; the advantage is that references made to religious attitudes apparently offer a greater solidity to the arguments exposed by historians, politicians, or journalists. The civil war in Yugoslavia has encouraged such a procedure and mostly journalists and specialists in "strategic studies" recur to formula that would transform the conflict between Croatians and Serbs into a war between Catholic and Orthodox Europe. The religious explanation is adorned with social interpretations that make "Orthodoxy" responsible for the "communitarian" way of life which can be encountered only in the Eastern part of Europe and which does not find palatable the ideas of human rights. The main objections to such explanations is that religious labels will not shed light on complex political phenomena and that it is difficult to suppose that after half a century of atheism, people in Eastern Europe would solve social and political matters by falling back on religious beliefs. No political actions have been taken in common by governments existing in the so-called "Orthodox Europe" except the wishful thinking of some researchers.(1) The good relations, for example, between Serbia and Romania or Greece and Romania have political and cultural reasons: no armed conflict opposed them and they lived in the same empire for centuries. If there does exist a certain feeling in Serbia, Bulgaria, and Greece that contemporary problems might be solved in common, it is because for a long period the Balkan people believed that Russia was able to defend them against the Ottomans and to set up a regime that would combine freedom with tolerance, and solidarity with respect for one's beliefs.(2) In this sense, one may speak today of a philo-Russian movement, but not of an Orthodox alliance. "Orthodox Europe" is not a political unity: it may designate, at the most, a part of the continent that maintained a specific cultural and religious legacy.

2.

It has been often affirmed that the Orthodox Church has always been under the control of the state and that a "cesaropapism" was characteristic of Eastern Europe. But reputed byzantinists like Hans Georg Beck(3) demonstrated that this label covers a dramatic tension between Church and State that was never solved: neither the emperor of Byzantium, nor the sultan, did control the Church, although the political power tried often to limit the influence of the Church. But this does not mean that the political power imposed its will on the Church in South East Europe.(4) "A symphonic dyarchy of imperium and sacerdotium remained the Byzantine ideal for a millennium and the Russian ideal for seven centuries."(5) The real problem was raised when the modern states created a new ministry which put under control the activity of the Church: the department for religious problems was created in Romania in the first half of the 19th century and so it happened also in other Balkan countries.(6) The national state asked the Church to support its policy and to give a national character to its activity a gesture that increased its political role and diminished its religious one. As well before the 19th century as after, the separation of the two powers - the spiritual and the temporal - did not allow an intermingling of ideas that would imbue political programs with religious concepts and feelings. The secular power was supposed to enforce justice and order as commanded by the divine will, while the spiritual power had to offer men the best way for saving their souls. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Traditional Toleration and Modern Pluralism: The Case of "Orthodox Europe."(Transcript)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.