The View from the Ivory Tower: Evaluating Doctoral Programs in Communication

By Neuendorf, Kimberly A.; Skalski, Paul D. et al. | Communication Reports, April-October 2007 | Go to article overview

The View from the Ivory Tower: Evaluating Doctoral Programs in Communication


Neuendorf, Kimberly A., Skalski, Paul D., Atkin, David J., Kogler-Hill, Susan E., Perloff, Richard M., Communication Reports


The present study assesses perceptions of (1) the quality of American graduate programs in communication, (2) the qualities that communication scholars deem important in a communication PhD program, and (3) the adequacy of the number of PhD programs with specific specialties and applications in communication.

A national survey of communication faculty and chairs was conducted via the World Wide Web. Study results suggest that top evaluative criteria for doctoral programs included the quality of the university library, up-to-date computer facilities, student attendance at academic conferences, the national research reputation of the communication faculty, and faculty encouragement of students to explore diverse perspectives on communication research. The only specialty for which a majority of respondents reported there are "not enough" is Media Information Technologies. Program quality rankings confirm past work suggesting that Midwestern programs--particularly those with applied origins in agricultural journalism--continue to rank highly in the field.

Keywords: Communication Discipline; Doctoral Programs; Reputational Rankings

**********

The study of institutional quality represents an active area of inquiry in the communication field (e.g., Burroughs, Christophel, Ady, & McGreal, 1989; Doctoral Education Committee, 2004; Hickson, Turner, & Bodon, 2003). The present study assesses perceptions of (1) the quality of American graduate programs in communication, (2) the qualities that communication scholars deem important in a communication PhD program, and (3) the adequacy of the number of PhD programs stressing specific specialties and applications in communication.

Literature Review

Defining the Field

Despite the fact that communication is one of the fastest growing fields in the U.S., ranking among the eight largest nationally in BA graduate production each year, information on enrollment trends remains sketchy (Craig & Carlone, 1998). This ambiguity may stem from the discipline's relative youth (Rogers, 1994), as it was not even recognized as a field of study by the Department of Education until 1966. The three decades to follow witnessed a 534% growth rate in the number of communication degrees awarded, during which time the journalism/mass communication subfield grew 1,500% (Becker & Graf, 1995; Becker, Vlad, Huh, & Prine, 2001). Even so, scholars (e.g., Atkin & Jeffres, 1998; Nelson, 1995) argued that communication programs were vulnerable to budget cuts through the 1990s. The academy's hesitancy to recognize communication as a discipline (Book, 1993) may stem from program identification challenges; that is, few academic units in communication use the same name (e.g., journalism vs. [mass] communication; communication vs. speech) (see Communiquest Interactive, 2004).

As these and other commentators suggest, communication scholars need to document their centrality to the academy in terms of pedagogy and academic quality. This is especially true during times of budgetary shortfall (Book, 1993), but as Craig and Carlone (1998, p. 67) note, "this turns out to be difficult because we find that rapid intellectual, institutional, and societal changes have rendered old familiar explanations obsolete and we no longer understand the field well ourselves." [1] The authors (1998, p. 68) outline how speech, journalism and other subfields have converged towards "communication," having been massively transformed as the field has grown to its present "amorphous contours," including the following sub-areas: communications, general; advertising; journalism; broadcast journalism, public relations and organizational communication; radio and television broadcasting; radio/television, general; communication media; and communications, other. These categories have been joined by "Speech/Rhetorical Studies" and, in some contexts, "Communication Disorders Sciences and Services" as well as "Drama" and "Film. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The View from the Ivory Tower: Evaluating Doctoral Programs in Communication
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.