Discount Rates and Energy Efficiency

By Howarth, Richard B.; Sanstad, Alan H. | Contemporary Economic Policy, July 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Discount Rates and Energy Efficiency


Howarth, Richard B., Sanstad, Alan H., Contemporary Economic Policy


I. INTRODUCTION

Markets for energy-using equipment are marked by a seeming anomaly: households and firms routinely pass up investments in energy-efficient technologies yielding rates-of-return well above those available on standard financial instruments. Market participants reveal high "implicit discount rates" in their evaluations of the costs and benefits of energy efficiency (Ruderman et al., 1987). Technology analysts point to the observed efficiency gap - the difference between the level of energy efficiency actually achieved and the level judged cost-effective by standard financial criteria - as clear evidence that real-world markets deviate from the ideals of Pareto efficient resource allocation. Since "market barriers" prevent the adoption of cost-effective energy-saving technologies, government presumably should intervene with equipment performance standards, demand-side management programs, and related policy measures (Carlsmith et al., 1990).

Economists as a group are broadly skeptical of such claims. Empirical studies purporting to demonstrate the existence of the efficiency gap have been challenged on methodological grounds, and the notion of "market barriers" has been questioned in light of economic theory (Sutherland, 1991). The claim that consumers reveal high discount rates in evaluating the costs and benefits of energy-using technologies, for example, is seemingly at odds with the hypothesis of utility maximization. Principles of rational behavior suggest that investors should evaluate alternative investments at a common discount rate, equated with the market rate of interest on standard financial instruments such as government bonds. However, potential investors might rationally demand high rates of return on risky assets. Accordingly, high implicit discount rates might reflect the perceived risk of efficiency investments - an explanation consistent with the hypothesis of efficiently structured markets.

With this in mind, the argument that high discount rates imply a need for policy intervention requires further justification. Although technology analysts generally frame their arguments in informal terms, they in fact already have taken a first step toward that justification. The market barriers typically discussed in the literature point to a range of factors that one might interpret as well-defined market imperfections (Carlsmith et al., 1990; Schipper et al., 1992; Krause, 1993). Consumers appear to be poorly informed concerning the net benefits of energy efficiency, and institutional factors forestall presumably desirable transactions. Behavioral studies suggest that people use rules of thumb that deviate from the norms of substantive rationality and thus bias their decisions against energy-efficient technologies (Kemp ton and Montgomery, 1982; Kempton and Layne, 1994; Sanstad and Howarth, 1994a).

II. ENERGY EFFICIENCY: MEASURING THE GAP

Economists sometimes argue that evidence on the costs and benefits of energy efficiency is derived using "engineering" techniques, implying that the results are necessarily suspect. However, the economic reasoning on which the results are based is conceptually straightforward: the main criteria are net present value and life-cycle cost. If consumers and firms render decisions in a fully rational manner and if markets are free from imperfections, then only cost-effective energy-efficient devices - those that minimize life-cycle costs at prevailing prices and interest rates - will be implemented under laissez faire conditions. Otherwise, it would be possible to find an alternative resource allocation providing higher levels of energy services - the flow of tangible and intangible benefits derived from energy-using devices - without offsetting reductions in the provision of other goods. Alternatively, society could maintain the level of energy services while increasing expenditures on other items.

Implicit discount rates are a test criterion used to evaluate the effectiveness of individual decisions or observed market outcomes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Discount Rates and Energy Efficiency
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?