High Court Rejects a Claim of Third-Party Fraud Liability

By Hopkins, Cheyenne | American Banker, January 16, 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

High Court Rejects a Claim of Third-Party Fraud Liability


Hopkins, Cheyenne, American Banker


In a case watched closely by corporate lenders, the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 3 Tuesday that fraud claims cannot be extended to third parties if investors did not rely on their statements or actions.

Lenders had worried that the case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta Inc., could spark similar suits against banks that did business with troubled companies like Enron Corp. and WorldCom Inc.

"The case could have had a lot of implications for exposing third-party advisers, including bankers, to potential liability," said Gil Schwartz, a partner at Schwartz & Ballen LLP. "It's refreshing to see the court recognize the business reality that advisers aren't responsible for some of the misdeeds of the company."

In the majority decision, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy ruled that implied right of action does not reach the third parties if investors did not rely on their statements or representations.

"Respondents' acts or statements were not relied upon by the investors and that, as a result, liability cannot be imposed upon respondents," Justice Kennedy wrote. "Reliance by the plaintiff upon the defendant's deceptive acts is an essential element of the private cause of action."

The case arose from an accounting scandal at Charter Communications Inc. Stoneridge accused Scientific Atlanta, now a unit of Cisco Systems Inc., and Motorola Inc. of participating in a scheme to inflate prices for cable boxes on the condition that the suppliers use the additional funds to purchase advertising from Charter.

The case asked whether Scientific Atlanta should be held responsible, but during oral arguments in October the justices sounded reluctant to extending such liability.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri had dismissed Stoneridge's lawsuit, citing the 1994 case Central Bank NA v. First Interstate Bank. In that case, the court refused to allow suits by private investors against defendants accused of aiding and abetting another company's securities fraud.

Congress followed in 1995 with a securities litigation reform law that gave the Securities and Exchange Commission more power to go after third parties. The oral arguments in the Stoneridge case focused on whether Congress intended that authority to extend to private shareholder litigation. In Tuesday's decision, Justice Kennedy ruled that Congress did not.

Tom Dewey, a partner at Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky LLP in New York, said the Supreme Court's decision is unlikely to spur tougher laws.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

High Court Rejects a Claim of Third-Party Fraud Liability
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?