Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Mimicking the Brain: Using Computers to Investigate Neurological Disorders

By: Seachrist, Lisa | Science News, July 22, 1995 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Mimicking the Brain: Using Computers to Investigate Neurological Disorders


Seachrist, Lisa, Science News


Deep within the brain a single neuron fires. That electrical signal

triggers a biochemical chain reaction that courses from neuron to neuron, ultimately forming a set of connections that brings alive a scenic vista, a child's touch, or the memory of a long-ago event. Arresting any part of that signal devastates the cognitive activities that appear to make us human.

While the speed and precision of the human brain lead some people to refer to it as the ultimate computer, the brain maintains a distinct advantage over the computer--resilience. When crucial interactions between neurons falter, the brain reroutes signals in an attempt to maintain the ability to think, remember, and perceive. "When you damage just one small part of the computer, the whole thing will collapse," says neurologist and computer scientist James Reggia of the University of Maryland in College Park. "The brain is very different. It is able to adjust its own circuitry."

Despite this resilience, the brain has its limitations. Neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's cause progressive losses of vital cognitive functions that no degree of brain-initiated rewiring can repair.

Scientists do not know why some conditions spur the brain to large-scale reorganization of the synapses, or junctions between neurons, whereas others result in permanent damage. The problem lies in a basic dichotomy in neuroscience: Remarkable gains in elucidating the way neurons communicate with each other on the molecular level simply haven't explained the biology of how we think, sense, and feel.

For the past decade, researchers have employed a controversial tool to decipher this puzzle: computer systems known as neural networks. These networks simulate elementary, but poorly understood, brain functions such as reading and …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?