Is This Going to Assist Vulnerable Australians?

By Altman, Jon | Impact, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Is This Going to Assist Vulnerable Australians?

Altman, Jon, Impact

The national emergency in the Northern Territory prompted by the Anderson/Wild Little Children Are Sacred report on child sex abuse has resulted in the most radical neo-paternalist social policy experiment in Australia in the past 40 years. On 21 June 2007, the Prime Minister and Minister for Families and Community Services and Indigenous Affairs announced 11 broad measures. These included far reaching powers in relation to the citizenship entitlements of Indigenous Australians: to determine how and where welfare recipients spend their income; to link payment of welfare to school attendance by children and to mandatorily dock parents' income to provide meals at school; to introduce market based rents and normal tenancy agreements for every abnormally overcrowded and dilapidated housing; and to give powers for appointed government business managers to direct local work-for-the-dole participants to work on ground clean up and repair of communities. Other measures included banning alcohol; introducing compulsory (rapidly changed to noncompulsory) health checks for children; banning pornography; scrapping the permit system; and allowing for the compulsory leasing of prescribed communities by the Commonwealth. On 23 July, an additional and extremely significant additional measure was announced: the abolition of the Community Development Employment Program (CDEP) incrementally from 1 October 2007 to 30 June 2008. This measure targeted at the NT only will affect about 7,500 CDEP workers. The passage of the Northern Territory Emergency Response legislation on Friday 17 August 2007 enshrined many of these measures into Australian law.

These measures aim to address the issue of child abuse and it is patently clear that many do not, indeed it is unclear if they will even assist to address the underlying issues that result in Indigenous marginalization and community dysfunction. I do not want to assess these measures because mere common sense tells us that they will not achieve the Australian Government's purported aim of stabilising, normalising and then exiting prescribed communities in five years. Suffice to say that if the Federal Government has not made inroads into delivering 'practical reconciliation' in the last decade (with this term referring to closing the gaps between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in the areas of health, housing, education and employment), then it is far from clear how it will manage to deliver 'normalisation' in five years in the remotest and most difficult circumstances. Two observations can be made here. First, the Government, with its renowned focus on short-termism and election cycles, may not believe that it will be around to be held accountable in five years. Second, given the Government's poor record in Indigenous affairs, why should Indigenous people in the NT or the Australian public in general be confident that the Government can deliver?

At a broad more philosophical level there are some extremely worrying aspects of this intervention backed by an investigative Emergency Task Force, enhanced police and a an army presence. Framed by the emotive rhetoric of child abuse, past failure, and national emergency, a draconian welfare regime has been justified and is being introduced. This punitive regime looks to initially regulate the behaviour of all Indigenous welfare beneficiaries in prescribed communities in the Northern Territory with the clear aim of altering people's values in the longer term to embrace those of mainstream Australia.

From a social policy perspective this is extremely worrying for many reasons. First, it is racist as it is targeted at Indigenous people only in the NT; the racial discrimination embedded in these measures is recognized by the Government in the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act so that these can be classified as special measures. Second, it is non-discretionary, in other words, all Aboriginal people are included in these punitive measures irrespective of their parenting or personal behaviour: it is assumed that all are bad parents, drinkers, and so on.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Is This Going to Assist Vulnerable Australians?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.