Democracy under Siege

By Yencken, David | Impact, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Democracy under Siege

Yencken, David, Impact

Australians are justly proud of their democratic traditions. Australia's system of government, established in 1900, drew upon British and United States models, selecting many of the best features of each. Recently, however, there have been many worrying signs. There are four aspects of democracy in Australia today about which Australians should be deeply concerned.

The first is the degree to which our political system relies on unwritten conventions and is thus vulnerable to attack by determined governments in a period of unprecedented growth in executive power. The Australian Constitution says nothing about many aspects of our current electoral, parliamentary and executive arrangements and contains a minimal set of citizen rights. Compulsory voting, a key element of universal suffrage, is, for example, not mentioned in the Constitution. A government with a majority in both houses can introduce and pass legislation with minimum debate. Where the conventions are not set out in legislation, governments can act at their will.

The second is the degree to which Australians have lost confidence in their politicians and governments. Australians are generally satisfied and proud of their democracy but are mistrustful of politicians, the federal parliament, the legal system and the public service. There has been a significant decline in confidence in government and in the moral standards of members of parliament over the past two decades. Political cynicism is a cancer because it encourages apathy, deters action and provides a breeding ground for unbridled power-seeking. Restoring faith in democratic institutions is therefore an important challenge for Australia's political future.

The third is the increasing erosion of democratic practices. While Australia's formal democratic institutions remain proud and strong, there have been many worrying signs. Some recent attacks on democracy may seem of minor consequence. It is only when they are looked at as a whole that their significance stands out strongly. These attacks represent a serious threat to democracy in Australia.

The fourth is the degree to which other major democracies have acted in recent years to strengthen public accountability and extend democratic practices. Australia once led the world in democratic innovations. Today, Australia has fallen far behind other major democracies such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and New Zealand.

The erosion of democracy in Australia--some examples

Recent amendments to the Australian Electoral Act mean that electoral rolls are closed to new enrolments the day of the issuing of electoral writs and to re-enrolments three days after the issuing of the writs. If this arrangement had been in place at the last federal election it would have prevented over 300,000 citizens from voting. Many other countries are moving in quite the opposite direction, making enrolment as easy as possible even up to election day.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Democracy under Siege


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?