Oversight and Insight: Legislative Review of Agencies and Lessons from the States

Harvard Law Review, December 2007 | Go to article overview

Oversight and Insight: Legislative Review of Agencies and Lessons from the States


The Vermont Yankees of the Founding generation never would have foreseen a Supreme Court case like Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., (1) precisely because they never would have imagined the way in which the U.S. government would become an administrative state, a government not limited to the three branches laid out in the Constitution, but rather infused with--perhaps dominated by--hundreds of administrative agencies charged with the everyday business of governance. (2) Indeed, administrative agencies have become a prominent feature of the national government, and their rise has engendered many constitutional battles regarding their legitimacy--and correspondingly, much scholarly ink.

The dominance of agencies is not limited to the federal sphere, however. To take but one of fifty examples, the state of Connecticut boasts a wide range of agencies that includes departments of agriculture, consumer protection, education, environmental protection, and labor. (3) As a result, states must grapple with the same types of issues that vex national actors, such as the sort of public notice that agencies must provide before they issue regulations and the appropriate scope of judicial review of agency decisions.

This Note seeks to answer a question implicitly left open by the Supreme Court's opinion in INS v. Chadha, (4) which deemed unconstitutional Congress's use of a legislative veto to overturn agency decisions (5): how should legislative oversight fit into the modern administrative state? (6) To answer this question, the Note draws on a generally overlooked source of comparison--practice at the level of individual states. An examination of the interaction of agencies and legislatures at the state level demonstrates what is missing at the national level: deliberate, systematic review of agency regulations. This gap seems particularly stark in light of the federal executive's centralized and fairly systematic review of agency rulemaking, as well as Congress's fairly comprehensive oversight in an area like the budget. An examination of state practices in this area strongly suggests the need for structural reforms at the national level, reforms which might seem unrealistic at first blush, but which have already been floated by some commentators and members of Congress.

This Note proceeds in three parts. Part I describes legislative oversight of agency rulemaking at the federal level, including the fairly recent innovation of the Congressional Review Act (7) (CRA), and highlights differences between congressional and executive oversight of agency rulemaking. Part II describes legislative oversight of administrative regulations at the state level, painting in particular detail the interactions between agencies and legislatures in two states--Alaska and Connecticut--and suggesting that it is very much possible for legislatures to provide systematic review of agency rulemaking. Part III evaluates the need for change at the national level and proposes structural reforms.

I. "THE" ADMINISTRATIVE STATE:AGENCIES, CONGRESS, AND COURTS AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL

By sanctioning the proliferation of agencies but imposing a sizable number of procedural constraints on them, the Administrative Procedure Act (8) (APA), enacted in 1946, marked a compromise between those who feared the rise of administrative agencies and questioned their constitutionality and those who believed that agencies were a necessary component of the modern state. (9) The APA's provisions, however, did not address many larger, structural concerns raised by the administrative state, including the balance of power among Congress, the federal courts, and the executive branch in controlling these agencies. This Part addresses the important, often constitutional, questions relating to legislative oversight of the administrative state, focusing in particular on the post-Chadha relationship between Congress and agencies.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Oversight and Insight: Legislative Review of Agencies and Lessons from the States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.