The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations

By Oswalt, Michael M. | Duke Law Journal, December 2007 | Go to article overview

The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations


Oswalt, Michael M., Duke Law Journal


ABSTRACT

Amid steadily declining union density, debate has taken center stage in the American labor movement regarding the potential--or even utility--of reforming the National Labor Relations Act to reverse the trend. This Note argues that such reform is possible, through a grand legislative bargain nationalizing the so-called right-to-work regime in exchange for abolishing the NLRB election in favor of the card-check union certification procedure. Using legal, sociological, and radical democratic theory and examples, this Note demonstrates that, counterintuitively, the right-to-work environment can strengthen unions instead of weakening them. Both changes therefore benefit labor.

INTRODUCTION

The seventieth anniversary of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (1) prompted renewed reflection on its ability to effectively govern relations between labor and management in the modern workplace. (2) For supporters of the American labor movement, the 2005 occasion was not a cause for celebration. (3) Although surveys showed that a majority of U.S. workers would vote for a union in their workplace if an election were held, (4) by 2006 the percentage of private wage-earners in unions had shrunk to 7.4 percent, (5) less than one-third the level reported in the early 1970s. (6) That the statute valiantly proclaimed the protection of the right to self-organization to be the "policy of the United States" (7) served only as a sardonic reminder of the gulf between the Act's ideals and the everyday realities of union organizing. (8) Some commentators called for various reforms of the Act, (9) others for its repeal. (10) Jonathan Hiatt, AFL-CIO general counsel, questioned "how much of the Act [would] be left" by its seventy-fifth anniversary, given the rate at which long-standing labor law doctrines had been undermined by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) in just the previous twelve months. (11)

Despite differences of opinion regarding traditional labor law's potential to revive workplace democracy, the labor movement has largely coalesced around a legislative proposal to reform the NLRA: the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). (12) The AFL-CIO centers its congressional lobbying efforts around the EFCA, to which the AFL-CIO website devotes significant attention and is the subject of aggressive petition, email, and organizational endorsement campaigns. (13)

The EFCA is ambitious legislation. It would eliminate the traditional secret-ballot NLRB election in favor of certifying a union pursuant to a Board finding that a majority of employees have signed authorizations designating the union as its bargaining representative. (14) The EFCA would also provide for first-contract mediation and arbitration if an employer and a union were unable to reach a contract agreement within ninety days. (15) And it would increase the penalties assessed to employers who commit unfair labor practices against employees during a union campaign or first-contract negotiation, including treble back pay, civil penalties, and a requirement that the NLRB seek a federal court injunction against an employer it finds has significantly interfered with employee rights during an organizing or first-contract campaign. (16)

Nonetheless, many question if any NLRA reform proposal--beneficial to the labor movement or not--is legislatively viable, regardless of which party controls the White House or Congress. In meticulously tracing the roots of what she terms the "ossification of labor law," (17) Professor Cynthia Estlund notes that "for many decades, both organized labor and especially employers have had enough support in Congress to block any significant amendment that either group strongly opposes." (18) The bar for "enough support" is rather low: "it means a minority that is big enough, well organized enough, and committed enough to tie up a bill through the arcane supermajority requirements of the Senate. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.