The Middle East and the Nightmare of Nuclear Proliferation

By Land, Thomas | Contemporary Review, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

The Middle East and the Nightmare of Nuclear Proliferation


Land, Thomas, Contemporary Review


IRAN has established a string of remote-launching missile bases capable of unmanned precision attacks on Israeli and American targets to deter a projected strike against its nuclear development facilities. Israel has ordered nuclear-capable submarines from Germany dedicated to an advanced second-strike role hitherto untried in the Middle East. Egypt and Turkey have announced new national atomic power development plans essential for joining a nuclear arms race with Iran in order to maintain regional stability. All this is pushing Saudi Arabia towards its long-pending decision to build or purchase the Bomb.

The Middle East has woken up to the nightmare principle of mutual assured destruction (MAD) invented during the bleakest days of the Cold War that ended with the demise of the Soviet Union less than two decades ago. The idea was that the chief antagonists and their allies invest enormous and escalating resources in the arms race to ensure that their adversaries dare not attack them for fear of precipitating their own certain peril. This fattened the armaments manufacturers and brought humanity closer to destruction during the twentieth century than at any other time since the Ice Age. There were hopes after the Cold War that the squandered resources could now be invested to the good of humanity in a form of 'peace dividend'. Instead, the world economy, which had been dominated by a voracious military-industrial complex present in all countries, plunged into recession because it could not cope with a prolonged absence of huge renewed armament orders.

Three bloody, lucrative, American-led wars--two in Iraq and one in Afghanistan--have changed that. US defence spending this year is over $550bn, half more than the budget inherited from the Clinton Administration in 2001 and almost as large as the combined military expenditure of all the other countries of the world. These Middle East wars and the ill-defined, widening 'war on terror' that feeds from them have also upset the delicate Shi'a/Sunni divide of the region. They have destroyed the Sunni powers of the Taleban in Afghanistan in November 2001 and Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq in April 2003, hitherto the greatest regional rivals of Shi'a Iran.

Israel's conflict on two fronts in June-July 2006 against the Palestinians in Gaza and Hizbullah in Lebanon has added to the regional dimensions of this instability. The Palestinian dream of statehood has receded further. Iran's influence has increased hugely--it now rivals that of the United States as the main gatekeeper at the crossroads between the Middle East and Asia.

Much of this is explored in a landmark analysis published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs at Chatham House in London. The study--Iran, its Neighbours & the Regional Crisis--has been compiled by an outstanding team of specialists. Some aspects of the work have already been overtaken by events because of the quick pace of development of the drama. But it may well remain for some time a trusted source of advice and basic reference to politicians, investors and students of the troubled region.

The study concludes that a prospective American-sponsored military strike to prevent Iran from building the bomb would be devastating for that country, the Persian Gulf and areas beyond. Iran warns that any such attack would provoke a terrible retribution meted out on Israel. The Chatham House analysis observes that a military conflict involving Iran must be global in scale because of the economic interdependence binding that country with the world's principal hydrocarbon importers.

Iran's nuclear ambitions date back to the pre-revolutionary era of the Shah in the 1960s. The country's present rulers insist that their programme is entirely legal and peaceful. But they have built two long-range missiles with a reach of up to 2,000km capable of hitting much of the Middle East including Israel and some of Europe. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Middle East and the Nightmare of Nuclear Proliferation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.