British Socialism and the Marshall Plan: James Williamson, Who Was Highly Commended in the Royal Historical Society/History Today Undergraduate Dissertation Prize 2006, Asks Whether Accepting US Economic Support in the Form of the European Recovery Programme, or Marshall Plan, in the Postwar Era Caused Clement Attlee's Labour Government to Water Down Its Socialist Agenda

By Williamson, James | History Today, February 2008 | Go to article overview

British Socialism and the Marshall Plan: James Williamson, Who Was Highly Commended in the Royal Historical Society/History Today Undergraduate Dissertation Prize 2006, Asks Whether Accepting US Economic Support in the Form of the European Recovery Programme, or Marshall Plan, in the Postwar Era Caused Clement Attlee's Labour Government to Water Down Its Socialist Agenda


Williamson, James, History Today


[ILLUSTRATIONS OMITTED]

When the Marshall Plan to reconstruct war-torn Europe through massive US economic and technical aid was introduced to Britain in the second half of 1948, President Harry Truman's administration and Attlee's socialist Labour government seemed unlikely and uncomfortable bedfellows in the field of economic reconstruction. On the one hand, US policymakers saw the removal of restrictions on trade and a flourishing free market as the formula for recovery; on the other Labour favoured a protectionist approach and much more active role for the state. As the balance of power in the relationship naturally lay firmly with the creditor, Labour's ability to withstand pressure from the US to cross this ideological divide would play a pivotal role in defining the success of its most ambitious projects, the creation of the Welfare State and its pledge to bring the nation's industries under public ownership.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Yet, rejecting Marshall Aid and thereby avoiding the risk of being forced to compromise on its domestic agenda, was never a serious option for Labour. Postwar economic recovery had been paralyzed by a chronic shortage of dollars, which made the purchase of essential imports, such as food and raw materials, impossible. This in turn severely hampered the nation's ability to revive its traditional manufacturing and industrial base which meant that dollar earning exports continued to be in short supply. The European Recovery Programme (ERP), as the Marshall Plan was officially known, promised to break this cycle by providing the UK--like other countries of western Europe--with the materials and goods to help raise levels of productivity.

The prime minister Clement Attlee was all too aware of the political dangers that the economy's fragile state encompassed. In 1947 he faced and survived an attempted coup orchestrated by the then President of the Board of Trade, Sir Stafford Cripps, who had become disenchanted with the Prime Minister's leadership as the UK's economic performance continued to falter. Attlee showed a characteristic deftness of political touch to face down the coup, but he was left with no doubt that his future as prime minister, not to mention the survival of the government, depended on economic recovery and therefore on Lahour's participation in the ERE As a result, Labour seized upon the American initiative when it was first publicly outlined by General George Marshall on June 5th, 1947, and were relieved to see Congress give its backing to the ERP in April of the following year.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Just as Truman had to secure legislative backing to launch the Marshall Plan, the Labour Government's receipt of aid was dependent upon the approval of Parliament. While the prospect of Britain's participation in the ERP was generally supported in the House of Commons, a motley crew of rightwing Conservatives, Labour backbenchers and Communists found themselves allied in opposing the motion, put before the House of Commons on July 5th and 6th, 1948, which asked MPs to support the Bilateral Agreement which would bring the ERP into force. The extremes on both right and left viewed the Marshall Plan as being both unnecessary and a final ignominy for Britain on the world stage. Leslie Solley, a Labour rebel, captured this sense of unease and frustration when he stated his belief that it would be a 'disaster of the first magnitude for this country to sell its grand heritage for a mess of pottage'.

In fact, after reviewing early drafts of the Bilateral in May 1948 members of the Government had had good reason to agree with the sentiments that would later be expressed by Solley. There was a general consensus that the document would be seen publicly as an American attempt to dictate economic policy and and there was indignation that in spite of the Anglo-American wartime alliance, the UK would not receive preferential treatment under the ERP and, formally at least, would be placed on the same footing as all other participating nations, including Italy, an ex-enemy country. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

British Socialism and the Marshall Plan: James Williamson, Who Was Highly Commended in the Royal Historical Society/History Today Undergraduate Dissertation Prize 2006, Asks Whether Accepting US Economic Support in the Form of the European Recovery Programme, or Marshall Plan, in the Postwar Era Caused Clement Attlee's Labour Government to Water Down Its Socialist Agenda
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.