In Re N.L.B. V. Lentz: The Missouri Supreme Court's Unwarranted Extension of a Putative Father's Constitutional Protections

By Standlee, Lauren | Missouri Law Review, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview

In Re N.L.B. V. Lentz: The Missouri Supreme Court's Unwarranted Extension of a Putative Father's Constitutional Protections


Standlee, Lauren, Missouri Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

"Out-of-wedlock births in the United States have climbed to an all-time high." (1)

Recent statistics indicate that nearly four in every ten children born in the United States have unwed parents, (2) and that these children are surrendered for adoption more frequently than children born into wedlock. (3) Adoption has life-long implications for all parties involved, especially the child. An adopted child "is less likely to grow up in poverty [and] more likely to obtain an education ... than a child raised by a single mother." (4) While a mother has a unilateral right to abort or to deliver a child without informing its biological father, the nature of an unwed father's rights to his child remains an unsettled area of law. (5)

According to Martin Bauer, president of the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys who specializes in contested adoptions, "the most common contest is where the morn wants to place the baby [for adoption] and the dad objects." (6) Due to the burgeoning number of babies born out of wedlock and the expanding number of unwed fathers who wish to play a role in their children's lives, putative fathers' (7) legal rights have become an increasing concern to parents and courts alike.

When a mother's rights are terminated (8) and the child is placed for adoption, the crucial issue is to determine what rights a putative father has, and also what he must do to avail himself of them. The difficulty arises in balancing the weight of the father's biological ties, when he has not assumed legal or custodial responsibilities for the child, against the necessity of expeditiously placing the child in a stable adoptive home. (9)

In the last few decades, courts have sharpened their focus on the rights of putative fathers and have consistently held that an unwed father's parental rights to his child are entitled to constitutional protections such as due process in certain situations. (10) For instance, putative fathers in almost all states are entitled to notice of an adoption proceeding or of a hearing to terminate their parental rights. (11) However, states require a putative father first to take some type of affirmative action, such as registering with the state's putative father registry or taking steps to assert his paternity, in order to protect his rights and ensure they receive such protection. (12) The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that the limited nature of a putative father's rights requires that he affirmatively "develop a relationship with his offspring" and "accept [] some measure of responsibility for the child's future" before his rights may receive constitutional protections. (13)

In Lentz, the Missouri Supreme Court granted an unwed father leave to intervene in an adoption, despite the fact that he had failed to bring himself into the realm of constitutionally protected putative fathers. (14) This note explains why the holding of the Lentz court subverted the intent of Missouri's adoption statutes and its putative father registry, and argues that an unwed biological father who has not filed a valid paternity action, registered with the putative father registry, or demonstrated a substantial commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood should not be entitled to the additional constitutional protections available to diligent putative fathers. The note will argue that it is not a violation of his constitutional fights to deny such a father leave to intervene in the adoption of his child without a hearing on parental fitness.

II. DUE PROCESS AND PUTATIVE FATHERS

Putative fathers have typically challenged state adoption and termination of parental rights statutes on due process or equal protection grounds. (15) These challenges are relatively recent developments, as historically biological fathers have enjoyed few rights to their illegitimate children because state laws provided that the mother's consent alone was necessary for an adoption to proceed.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

In Re N.L.B. V. Lentz: The Missouri Supreme Court's Unwarranted Extension of a Putative Father's Constitutional Protections
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.