Buyer Beware: You May Be Liable for the Defective Products of Your Predecessor

By Meyer, Kenneth R.; Sharkey, Brian P. et al. | Defense Counsel Journal, April 2008 | Go to article overview

Buyer Beware: You May Be Liable for the Defective Products of Your Predecessor


Meyer, Kenneth R., Sharkey, Brian P., Hallberg, Justin C., Defense Counsel Journal


COMPANY A is evaluating whether it should purchase the assets of Company B, which manufactures washing machines. Company A has been looking to break into the washing machine market and sees the purchase of Company B's assets as an excellent opportunity to do so. Company A is considering two courses of action if it purchases Company B's assets: 1) continue the manufacture of Company B's washing machine product line, using Company B's designs, specifications, diagrams, blueprints, personnel, and manufacturing facilities; or 2) cease the manufacturing of the product line, but continue Company B's ancillary business of repairing and servicing the washing machines it sold to its customers. Company A comes to you with a seemingly straightforward question: under these two scenarios, will it be held liable for product liability claims arising from Company B's manufacture and sale of defective washing machines, even if, as part of the asset purchase, it expressly declines to assume Company B's liabilities? Unfortunately, based on the current state of the law, you will not be able to provide Company A with an easy, clear-cut answer.

The General Rule and the Traditional and Non-Traditional Exceptions

In the United States, the general rule of corporate-successor liability is that when a company sells its assets, as distinguished from stock, to another company, the acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the selling company simply because it succeeds to the ownership of the seller's assets. (1) There are four traditional exceptions to that general rule: 1) the successor expressly or impliedly assumes the predecessor's liabilities; 2) there is an actual or de facto consolidation or merger of the seller and the purchaser; 3) the purchasing company is a mere continuation of the seller; or 4) the transaction is entered into fraudulently to escape liability. (2)

The general rule and its four traditional exceptions (hereafter referred to as the "traditional approach") apply fundamental tort and corporate law principles to protect successor corporations from product liability. Under tort law, successor corporations are free from liability because they are not within the basic tort principle that "one engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing products who sells or distributes a defective product is subject to liability for harm to persons or property caused by the defect." (3) As a result, successor corporations are not liable for the products sold by predecessor corporations under the traditional approach. General corporate law reinforces nonliability for successor corporations because corporate law "favors free alienability of corporate assets and limits shareholders' exposures to liability in order to facilitate the formation and investment of capital." (4) Thus, to protect free market transfers of and between corporations, successor corporations are not subject to successor liability under the traditional approach.

Several jurisdictions, however, have developed two additional exceptions to the general rule of nonliability. Unlike the four traditional exceptions, these newer, nontraditional exceptions (hereafter referred to as "the non-traditional exceptions") do not emphasize the corporate form but instead focus on the acquiring entity's operations following the asset purchase. By doing so, the jurisdictions applying these exceptions are more likely to impose liability upon successor corporations. One of these exceptions is referred to as the continuity of enterprise exception. The Supreme Court of Michigan case, Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co., is the seminal case adopting this exception. (5) Under this exception, a successor corporation may be liable for a predecessor company's injury-causing product where the totality of the circumstances surrounding the acquisition demonstrates a basic continuation of the enterprise from the seller to the buyer. Turner held that an individual injured by a predecessor's product could establish a prima facie case under this exception against the successor if he established the following facts: 1) a continuation of the seller corporation, in terms of a continuity of management, personnel, physical location, assets, and general business operations of the predecessor corporation; 2) the predecessor corporation ceases its ordinary business operations, liquidates, and dissolves as soon as practicable; 3) the successor corporation assumes the liability and obligations of the seller ordinarily necessary for the uninterrupted continuation of normal business operations of the predecessor corporation; and 4) the successor corporation holds itself out as the continuation of the predecessor corporation.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Buyer Beware: You May Be Liable for the Defective Products of Your Predecessor
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.