The Age of the Coa Valley (Portugal) Rock-Art: Validation of Archaeological Dating to the Palaeolithic and Refutation of 'Scientific' Dating to Historic or Proto-Historic Times

By Zilhao, Joao | Antiquity, December 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Age of the Coa Valley (Portugal) Rock-Art: Validation of Archaeological Dating to the Palaeolithic and Refutation of 'Scientific' Dating to Historic or Proto-Historic Times


Zilhao, Joao, Antiquity


The dating studies of the `modern rock-art scientists', when critically examined, are found not to show that the Coa valley petroglyphs are of recent age. Their Upper Palaeolithic characteristics, and therefore their likely late Pleistocene age, are consistent with their archaelogical context.

Results of EDP's project

For the most part, the thousands of petroglyphs recently found in the Coa valley have been unanimously attributed to the Palaeolithic, on stylistic grounds, by archaeologists and rock-art experts from all over the world (Bahn EDP (Electricidade de Portugal), the state-owned electricity company building the dam that threatens to submerge and destroy the site, however, decided that stylistic analysis was not enough to establish the age and relevance of this art. They organized a `direct dating project' aimed at obtaining `scientific' chronological estimates and hired two Australian (Alan Watchman and Robert Bednarik) and two American (Fred Phillips and Ronald Dorn) dating professionals to carry out these studies.

The four researchers are. supposed to have worked independently, in a `blind test' experiment. Although EDP (Electricidade de Portugal) and the Minister for Industry have used their reports as the basis for policy, they have not made them public. The authors have refused to make them directly available to Portuguese archaeologists, although a copy of Bednarik's report was obtained through independent channels.

Evaluation of EDP's `direct dating project' therefore relies on the following:

* The results reported by O Independente (Sa & Ferreira 1995);

* Bednarik's (1995b) report;

* Dorn's (1995) table of minimum ages, given to the press by the office of the Minister for Industry,

* Watchman's (1995a) `Executive Summary', also given to the press by the office of the Minister for Industry;

* Watchman's statements to the Portuguese newspaper Publico (Salema 1995);

* Watchman's statements to Science (Fischman 1995);

* Abstract of Watchman's (1995b) paper at the September 1995 International Rock Art Congress of Turin (Italy).

Figure 1 shows the location of the Coa valley art-sites known to contain stylistically Palaeolithic petroglyphs. The first 6.5 km upstream from the river-mouth have been partially flooded since the early 1980s by the Pocinho dam on the Douro. The engravings presently visible in localities 3-6 of Figure 1 represent just the tip of an artistic landscape now submerged under a few metres of water most of the year. The Foz Coa dam would drown these sites to a depth of more than 100 metres.

According to EDP (1995), all four researchers worked on the same three panels, at Canada do Inferno (Figure 1.4), Ribeira de Piscos (Figure 1.8), and Penascosa (Figure 1.11). As other illustrations in this paper, the tracings of these three panels (Figure 2) are partial and preliminary, intended only for independent stylistic evaluation by the readers, a purpose for which they are considered accurate enough. Systematic tracing and analysis of the Coa rock art is now under way by a government appointed team led by Portuguese rock-art researchers A.M. Baptista and M.V. Gomes.

Phillips, Chlorine-36 dating

Fred Phillips used Chlorine-36 studies to attempt a direct dating of the age of exposure of the engraved rock surfaces, that is, to obtain a maximum age for the petroglyphs.

Sa & Ferreira (1995), published on 7 July, report that Phillips obtained a maximum age of 3000 years for the Canada do Inferno panel. In a letter to the present author, dated 20 July, Bednarik mentioned Phillips' results as part of the `proof' that the three panels were post-Palaeolithic; he repeated this in oral presentation to the Turin congress. But a letter by Monty Flinsch, a collaborator of Phillips, dated 7 July and distributed at a press conference held by the EDP on 13 July, stated that it had not yet been possible to process the Coa samples, and that it would not be possible to do it until late August.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Age of the Coa Valley (Portugal) Rock-Art: Validation of Archaeological Dating to the Palaeolithic and Refutation of 'Scientific' Dating to Historic or Proto-Historic Times
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?