End-User Perceptions of a Graphical User Interface for Bibliographic Searching: An Exploratory Study

By Tomaiuolo, Nicholas G. | Computers in Libraries, January 1996 | Go to article overview

End-User Perceptions of a Graphical User Interface for Bibliographic Searching: An Exploratory Study


Tomaiuolo, Nicholas G., Computers in Libraries


Computer publications often praise the graphical user interface (GUI).(1,2,3) Since its introduction in 1985, Microsoft Windows, probably the most popular GUI, has been viewed as a time saver, money saver, productivity booster, and learning-curve tamer.

Until relatively recently, however, few bibliographic applications intended for library end-users employed this platform. While Windows programs have saturated the home and business computing markets with a wide variety of applications from games to package-shipping software, many companies that furnish libraries with information resources continue to distribute character-based interface/DOS products.

The relative scarcity of GUI library products in the exhibit halls at the Information Today Inc.'s 16th Annual National Online Meeting (May 1995) reinforced this perception. University Microfilms International (UMI), a major library database distributor and originator of the popular academic databases Periodicals Abstracts Research Levels I/II and Dissertation Abstracts International, is looking at the GUI as a possible interface. Currently, Information Access Company had no GUI versions of its popular bibliographic databases Health Reference Center or InfoTrac (although it does have three titles running on the Windows platform: Computer Select, IntelliSeek, and Auto Reference Complete - for automobiles). NewsBank, a major full-text resource, also continues to default to the DOS platform. Of course, many DOS applications may be started from Windows, but this does not make them graphical user interface programs.

A few database distributors, however, are aggressively exploiting the Windows platform. Ovid Technologies distributes dozens of scientific, academic, and popular databases accessible via both Windows and DOS. Among these are Dissertation Abstracts, Current Contents, MEDLINE, and Wilson's Readers' Guide Abstracts. SilverPlatter Information offers both Windows and DOS accessibility to the majority of its numerous databases including UMI Periodicals Abstracts Research II, Social Work Abstracts, and the Encyclopedia of Associations. Gale Research includes Windows software with some of its products. LEXIS-NEXIS has given end users a DOS/Windows choice since 1991. EBSCO is testing a full-text Windows bibliographic database. Specialized current-awareness databases such as Reference Update have also migrated to an optional Windows version.

Statistics prove Windows is the interface of choice. In April 1995, the Software Publishers Association (SPA) announced that Windows applications accounted for 65 percent of the software sold in 1994 with sales reaching $4.78 billion. In July 1995, the SPA's tally for Windows applications had already reached $1.43 billion for the first quarter of the year; Windows programs currently account for 71 percent of the total North American market.(4) Meanwhile, DOS applications sales slipped 25 percent. Thirty-one percent of present non-Windows users told the SPA that they would be adopting Windows as their operating platform in the coming months.(5)

Yet character-based bibliographic information is firmly entrenched in our libraries. SilverPlatter's DOS SPIRS software dominates; the character-based ProQuest, used by UMI, is another frequently encountered interface. Most of the online resources that both individual libraries and consortium-oriented libraries use are also character-based (e.g., EBSCO, CARL, FirstSearch). The general public's familiarity with character-based bibliographic databases makes it tempting for librarians to refrain from experimenting with GUIs. Other factors may also account for librarians' reluctance in moving to Windows. Although the popularity of the Windows platform warrants a change and there are enough products to initiate the migration, there is a concern that switching platforms to a GUI will confuse end users. Consequently, public services librarians are concerned that a new interface will result in more end-user training. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

End-User Perceptions of a Graphical User Interface for Bibliographic Searching: An Exploratory Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.