Accessible Rural Transportation: An Evaluation of the Traveler's Cheque Voucher Program

By Gonzales, Linda; Stombaugh, Dennis et al. | Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society, Autumn 2006 | Go to article overview

Accessible Rural Transportation: An Evaluation of the Traveler's Cheque Voucher Program


Gonzales, Linda, Stombaugh, Dennis, Seekins, Tom, Kasnitz, Devva, Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society


There are approximately 12.5 million people with disabilities living in rural areas of the United States, six million of who have a severe disability (Seekins, 1995). People with disabilities and disability service providers in rural areas cite the lack of transportation as one of their most significant and persistent problems (Arcury, Priesser, Gesler, & Powers, 2005; Arnold, Seekins, & Nelson, 1997; Bernier & Seekins, 1999; Gonzales, Kasnitz, & Seekins, 2000; Jackson, Seekins, & Offner, 1992; National Council on Disability, 2005).

In general, the lack of rural transportation has been a defining problem for both rural communities and people with disabilities (e.g., Burkhardt, Nelson, Murray & Koffman, 2004; Gillis, 1989; Rucker, 1994). Federal public transportation funds have historically been inequitably allocated between urban and rural areas--an inequity with a particularly significant, deleterious impact on people with disabilities and disability service providers in rural areas (Bernier & Seekins, 1999). This discrepancy translates directly into the experience of individuals. For example, the Rural Transit Assistance Program (1995) reported that urban public transportation provided an average of 955 trips annually--nearly 20 rides each workweek--for urban households without a car. In contrast, people living in rural areas who don't own a vehicle average only about 38 publicly-subsidized rides per year, less than one ride per workweek. Obviously, this discrepancy can limit participation in community life, and make living and working independently relatively more difficult in rural areas.

The 2005 re-authorization of the Transportation Equity Act (P.L. 109-59) increased the total funding for public transportation from $3.8 billion to $4.2 billion, increased the funding for rural transportation from $241 million to $448 million, and increased transportation funding for the elderly and individuals with disabilities from $90 million to $190 million. Still, the discrepancy between urban and rural transportation allocations remains significant. About 89% of transportation funds subsidizes transportation for the 75% of the population living in urban areas, while only about 11% goes to support transportation for the 25% of the nation's population living in rural areas. The magnitude of this discrepancy suggests why transportation has been a consistent problem in rural areas.

Section 5311 of the Transportation Act provides funding to operate rural transportation systems. To be eligible, a community must organize a transportation agency and develop means to match Federal operating funds by 50%. This is typically done through rider fees and local taxes. Presumably, as a public program covered both by the ADA and other national and state legislation, these services provide accessible transportation to people with disabilities. Still, Rucker (1994) reports that one out of thirteen rural households doesn't own a private vehicle and 41% of rural residents lives in the nation's 1,200 counties with no public transportation at all. He reports that 11.9 million people with disabilities living in rural areas are classified as transportation-dependent and one million of those are also classified as poor. Clearly, the need for innovative rural transportation options for people with disabilities is great.

Despite the significant lack of transportation options for people with disabilities living in rural areas, there are few reports of appropriate models for delivering such services. Kidder (1989) described a "brokered" or "cooperative" rural transportation model for people with disabilities that forged transportation cooperatives among agencies with federally-funded vehicles. For example, a senior citizen program, a mental health center, and a developmental disabilities service provider might form a community transportation cooperative by combining their vehicles and transportation budgets to serve all people with disabilities--not just each agency's clients.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Accessible Rural Transportation: An Evaluation of the Traveler's Cheque Voucher Program
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.