Commercial and Consumer Credit Law - Class Action Remedy Unavailable in First Circuit for Plaintiffs Seeking Rescission under Truth in Lending Act

By MacInnis, Nicholas G. | Suffolk University Law Review, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Commercial and Consumer Credit Law - Class Action Remedy Unavailable in First Circuit for Plaintiffs Seeking Rescission under Truth in Lending Act


MacInnis, Nicholas G., Suffolk University Law Review


Commercial and Consumer Credit Law--Class Action Remedy Unavailable in First Circuit for Plaintiffs Seeking Rescission Under Truth in Lending Act-McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., 475 F.3d 418 (1st Cir. 2007)

The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) provides consumers with the right to rescind their loan agreements within three days of the closing of the transactions. (1) Beyond this statutory provision permitting consumer recovery, the federal courts remain split as to the availability of class certification for actions brought under TILA. (2) In McKenna v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., (3) the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit considered, in a case of first impression, the legitimacy of class actions brought under the rescission provisions of TILA. (4) Relying on its interpretation of congressional intent and the personalized remedy provided by the rescission section, the court held that class certification is unavailable in rescission actions under TILA. (5)

Ralph McKenna and Christopher and Laurie Lillie received mortgage loans from First Horizon Home Loan Corporation (First Horizon) in June and August of 2003, respectively. (6) In March 2004, both parties filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts claiming the forms they received from First Horizon, which explained their rights of rescission, were defective. (7) Specifically, the plaintiffs argued that the forms violated TILA's disclosure requirements by failing to distinguish between the rescissory rights of those refinancing loans procured from a different lender and those initially received from First Horizon. (8) The plaintiffs also moved to certify a class of plaintiffs who acquired loans with similarly defective disclosures. (9)

The magistrate judge, finding that TILA does not preclude the use of the class action mechanism and that the proposed class met the requirements of Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, narrowed the class and recommended certification. (10) The district court adopted the magistrate's class certification recommendation and First Horizon sought interlocutory review. (11) The First Circuit reversed and held that class certification is unavailable for rescission claims under TILA. (12) In denying class certification, the court reasoned that Congress did not intend to permit class actions as a judicial vehicle for rescissory relief because such relief would expose lenders to "overwhelming liability." (13)

In 1968, Congress enacted TILA to protect consumers from potentially unfair credit practices by requiring lending institutions to disclose credit terms to consumers and encourage "informed use of credit." (14) Congress modified TILA in 1974 by placing a damages cap on actions brought under [section] 1640, the section of TILA authorizing civil liability. (15) Notably, Congress did not impose a cap on the amended version of [section] 1635, the section of TILA providing the rescission remedy. (16) Twenty-one years later, to alleviate concerns and ambiguity surrounding the legitimacy of class certification for rescission suits under TILA, Congress modified the statute again with the Truth in Lending Act Amendments of 1995 (Amendments). (17) Consistent with the Amendments' emphasis on creditor protection, Congress also imposed a six-month moratorium on class action suits prior to passing the TILA Amendments. (18) As enacted, the Amendments remained silent regarding the class action mechanism in suits brought pursuant to [section] 1635. (19)

Prior to the First Circuit's ruling in McKenna, the Fifth Circuit was the only circuit court to address whether rescission class actions are permissible under TILA. (20) In James v. Home Construction Co. of Mobile, Inc., (21) the Fifth Circuit held that the personalized provisions under [section] 1635(b) illustrated congressional opposition to class action rescission. (22) Subsequent district court decisions also focused on the individuated remedy of [section] 1635 when ruling against the availability of class treatment for rescission suits.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Commercial and Consumer Credit Law - Class Action Remedy Unavailable in First Circuit for Plaintiffs Seeking Rescission under Truth in Lending Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?