The Politics of Ignorance: Welfare Reform Is Ambitious Social Engineering

By Samuelson, Robert | Newsweek, December 18, 1995 | Go to article overview

The Politics of Ignorance: Welfare Reform Is Ambitious Social Engineering


Samuelson, Robert, Newsweek


The raging debate over "Welfare Reform," Now coming to a climax, is a creature of many other agendas. On the one hand, Republicans want to cut programs for the poor to balance the budget. On the other, liberal advocates for the poor are threatened by reform." Suppose it actually succeeds - that is, promotes work and family cohesion. Then these advocates, who have spent their lives trying to help the poor by expanding government benefits, would see the worth of all their beliefs and strivings thrown into question.

I don't want to suggest that all of the arguments in this debate are insincere or without merit. But the rhetorical extremes - pitting claims that reform will end the "culture of dependence" against cries that it will "throw children into the streets" - reflect the self-interest of the debaters and ignore the difficulty of the task. What we call welfare reform is really the most ambitious sort of social engineering: it presumes government can alter how people behave.

Welfare itself illustrates how flimsy this power is. Recall that in 1960 only 5 percent of births were out-of-wedlock (2 percent among whites, 22 percent among blacks). By 1993 that figure was 31 percent (24 percent among whites, 69 percent among blacks). Welfare didn't singlehandedly cause this explosion, and among the other causes (earlier sexual activity, later marriage and more economic independence for women), it is probably low on the list.

Still, welfare may have contributed by enabling poor mothers to survive alone and, thereby, encouraging fathers to abandon their children. Nor is it inconceivable that tougher welfare could help reverse these disastrous trends, especially if it coincides with a general re-evaluation of the importance of families. When New Jersey prohibited extra payments to mothers who had another child, birthrates among welfare mothers dropped by more than 10 percent. Maybe that was a coincidence, and maybe it wasn't.

Certainly, the welfare bill now being completed by Congress is tougher. It would end automatic federal payments to poor single mothers. Instead, states would receive a fixed "block grant" with which to operate programs. The states could set benefits and eligibility within broad mandates from Washington.

Lifetime eligibility: Most welfare recipients couldn't receive more than five years of cash benefits, though states could set shorter limits. States could exempt 15 percent of their caseload - people deemed dependent - from this requirement. Now almost half of recipients at any one time have been on welfare five years.

Unwed teenage mothers: To receive benefits, they would have to live with parents or other approved adults. They would also have to attend school. States could go further and deny benefits entirely to unwed mothers under 18.

Family `caps': States could decide whether or not to increase benefits for a mother who had a child while on welfare.

Child support: By 1998, states would have to have a system to check newly hired workers to see if they were making child-support payments. If not, employers would be ordered to impose payroll deductions. States would also have to empower themselves to strip delinquent fathers of drivers' or professional licenses. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Politics of Ignorance: Welfare Reform Is Ambitious Social Engineering
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.