Most Poachers Are Only Small Fish in an Ocean Where Policy Is the Real Shark

Cape Times (South Africa), May 15, 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Most Poachers Are Only Small Fish in an Ocean Where Policy Is the Real Shark

In today's article in our series, Mariam January, a researcher on the Governance of Africa's Resources Programme of the South African Institute of International Affairs, argues that poachers are often just the victims of poor fisheries policy.

Poachers are not the core problem in the management of South African marine resources, it is poor policy. This poor policy effectively turns ordinary traditional fishers into poachers, and traditional law enforcement strategies are failing to curb the problem.

Traditionally, the way in which national parks and game reserves were declared did not take cognisance of the existing land uses and utilisation of wild fauna and flora by communities living in proposed parks. Thus, upon declaration, people were evicted from their ancestral land and were forced to alter traditional land use patterns. Failure to do so resulted in being branded as poachers and persecuted for continuing to eke out a meagre livelihood.

There is a similar pattern in the present-day fisheries sector. Fishers have been let down by the post-apartheid dispensation; despite progressive environmental laws, the situation for poor coastal communities has worsened.

Access to resources they have historically harvested has not materialised, and there is mounting evidence that the people who were meant to benefit from the rights allocation processes did not. Fishers have thus been marginalised further through systematic denial of access rights.

Post-apartheid fishery legislation, the Marine Living Resources Act (MLRA 18 of 1998), is aimed at:

l Transforming the fishing industry by increasing black ownership in the commercial industry and also providing access to marine resources to poor indigent fishing communities.

l Ensuring sustainability of the marine resources.

l Ensuring economic stability of the existing commercial fishing industry.

Marine and Coastal Management (MCM), the national agency responsible for fisheries management, was tasked with transforming the fishing industry without "rocking the boat" - an extremely difficult task, exacerbated by MCM's lack of institutional capacity.

MCM, previously known as the Sea Fisheries Institute, was historically a research institution with a staff complement of primarily natural scientists, who are now tasked with performing managerial functions, for which they are often ill-equipped. This managerial lacuna led to highly contested rights allocation processes in 2002 and 2005.

There is still scant recognition of the deep flaws inherent in the previous rights allocation processes. Thus far, the only recognition of the glaring inequities resulting from the rights allocations of 2002 and 2005 was when the NGO Masifundise took the Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism to court in 2006, resulting in an out-of-court settlement in May 2007.

Part of the settlement was to redraft the poorly-written subsistence fisheries policy in a manner that effectively engaged all the relevant stakeholders.

The subsistence fisheries policy was to be finalised by the end of March 2008 and, in the interim, MCM initiated interim relief permits as a measure to provide access to marine resources to those fishers who have been disadvantaged by the previous rights allocation processes. This was put in place as part of the court settlement.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Most Poachers Are Only Small Fish in an Ocean Where Policy Is the Real Shark


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?