'Hinduism' and 'Taoism' in Singapore: Seeing Points of Convergence

By Sinha, Vineeta | Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, February 2008 | Go to article overview

'Hinduism' and 'Taoism' in Singapore: Seeing Points of Convergence


Sinha, Vineeta, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies


Introduction

In Singapore today, the labels 'Hinduism' and 'Taoism' are official, administrative census categories denoting named and differentiated religions as well as markers of individual religious affiliation. Yet, these terms also have complicated histories that take them beyond the local context, and connect them to the development of religious thought and practice in India and China, respectively. In the history of colonial British Malaya, racial and religious categories had served to classify and profile a plural and segmented population, facilitating the task of governance and administration. The label 'Hinduism' was used in colonial discourse in such a manner, both in India and in British Malaya. However, the label 'Taoism' is a relative latecomer, having being introduced into local religious discourse only in the 1980s. By now, in the multireligious yet secular context of the Singapore nation-state, they are firmly embedded in everyday discourse and consciousness as two religious options that Singaporeans use to signal their religious identities. The local multicultural, multireligious and multiethnic scene is still defined by attention to racial and religious differences, important as primordial attachment and as a policy of governance.

The argument of this paper unfolds thus: I begin by documenting the meanings the labels 'Hinduism' and 'Taoism' carry locally and highlight the complexities and ambiguities in discussions that invoke them. I then turn to the organisational domain to document how 'Hindu' and 'Taoist' institutions have talked about their respective religions in the public sphere; how they both face pressures to modernise in order to be relevant, tracking the routes the two communities have taken to achieve their goals. Such a focus allows me to demonstrate overlaps in the articulations and efforts with respect to the future of these two religious traditions and to reflect on the sociological implications of the noted parallels and convergences.

Contextualising the labels 'Taoism' and 'Hinduism'

The first census of independent Singapore was held in 1970, when the sociocultural dimension of the population was captured via data on ethnic groups, dialect groups and languages spoken, but with no data on religious affiliation. The next census of 1980 is historically important for a first-time religious profiling of Singaporeans. (1) Data on the size and strength of religious communities, including rejection of religion and thus shifts in religiosity have become a regular feature in population censuses since then. The 1980 census is further marked by its boldness in providing a set of concepts and definitions of 'religion' and seven religious options under this category. 'Religion' is defined as the faith or spiritual belief as stated by the person regardless of how faithfully he practises it. (2)

The seven choices for respondents aged 10 years or more are listed as: Christianity, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, Islam, Other Religions and No Religion. (3) For present purposes, I refer only to the offered definitions of 'Taoism' and 'Hinduism'. The former is defined thus: 'This refers to persons who state that they believe in the philosophy of Confucius, Mencius or Lao Zi. Those believing in ancestor worship and in various Chinese deities are also included in this category.'

The 1980 definition of religion continued in the 1990 and 2000 censuses and the seven options remained; interestingly, the reports no longer carried their definitions. In 1990, a notable change is that the description 'Chinese Traditional Beliefs' is pegged to the category 'Taoism'. The timing of this double-barrelling exercise merits notice, given that it coincides with a strong wave of reform Buddhism signalling its presence on the island. The expanded category of 'Chinese Traditional Beliefs' / Taoism is an effort to delimit its boundaries and, more importantly, differentiate it from a new kind of 'Buddhism' which distances itself from such elements as ancestor worship, aspects of Mahayana Buddhism, Chinese folk beliefs, worship of spirits and deities, spiritmedium cults, mystical, superstitious and ritualised practices - all of which would constitute a syncretic mix of 'traditional Chinese religion'.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

'Hinduism' and 'Taoism' in Singapore: Seeing Points of Convergence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.