Motive, Fallout

By Simpson, Jeffrey | Queen's Quarterly, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Motive, Fallout


Simpson, Jeffrey, Queen's Quarterly


If most reporting is about motive and fallout, it becomes the reporting of political calculation, and therefore assumes that political decisions are all about calculation, and nothing else. No wonder, then, that the citizens, when fed this kind of reporting, believe, as the media lead them to believe, that all politics is calculation, that no politician ever thinks about the national interest, the substance of issues, and what is right or wrong, as opposed to what will sell or not.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

IN November 2007, Finance Minister James Flaherty announced the second one-point reduction in the Goods and Services Tax. The Conservatives had promised this two-point drop in the election, and they delivered. The cost of this decision to the federal treasury was about $60 billion over five years, by far the largest fiscal policy change since Prime Minister Stephen Harper's election.

Within minutes of the announcement, one of Canada's premier television journalists turned to his assembled guests and asked what they thought about this "pre-Christmas present," the assumption being that voters would love the latest GST cut.

Throughout the next hour, as guests came and went, all questions and what passed for discussion swirled around the political implications of the tax cut. Not once did the host ask, nor did a guest venture an opinion, about whether the cut made economic or fiscal sense. In other words, the entire discussion centred not on whether the policy was good or bad substantively, but rather whether it was good or bad politically.

Most of the newspaper "analysis" and commentary the next day picked up the same questions: would this precipitate an election? How would the opposition Liberals respond to this "present?" How could such an obviously attractive tax cut not help the Conservatives? Who would win, and who would lose?

Weeks later, the Globe and Mail got around to asking twenty business and academic economists what they thought of the GST cut. Two approved of it; two offered no opinion; sixteen said it was bad policy.

This kind of "analysis" ought to have informed the immediate reaction, but reporting and commenting on substance in the contemporary media have long been chased by speculation about the motives behind and the politics surrounding almost every decision government makes.

Every government tries to anticipate political reaction before making a decision. Politicians are in a marketplace, after all, offering themselves and their ideas to customers/voters. To suggest that political considerations are divorced from policy is fantasy; to suggest, however, that nothing but political considerations drive policy is also fantasy. At least most of the time.

Too much of what now passes for political reporting in Canada is about motives and optics; too little about the soundness, or otherwise, of what is actually being proposed or done. Somehow, a balance between motives/optics and substance has been lost, because of the nature of the contemporary media, the way governments manipulate information, and perhaps, sad to say, an audience increasingly conditioned to the sound bite.

The worst offenders--and in this I know whereof I write--are the panels of talking heads that have proliferated on television. What passes for discussion in these compressed segments of six or seven minutes is about who's up and who's down, which side wins and which loses, how the government's fortunes will be affected by this or that development. It's all politics, all the time, with these panels, as it is quite often with the instant "analysis" offered by commentators who pop up on 24-hour news channels within seconds of an announcement or event.

Almost all of this instant political analysis is demonstrably wrong, because it rests on false foundations--namely that the "public" is paying attention, will react in a particular way to a specific event or announcement, and will therefore be more inclined come voting day to mark a ballot in a certain way.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Motive, Fallout
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.