Vigilance Latencies to Aircraft Detection among NORAD Surveillance Operators

By Pigeau, R. A.; Angus, R. G. et al. | Human Factors, September 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Vigilance Latencies to Aircraft Detection among NORAD Surveillance Operators

Pigeau, R. A., Angus, R. G., O'Neill, P., Mack, I., Human Factors


Numerous vigilance researchers have questioned the wisdom of generalizing laboratory results to real-world tasks (Adams, 1987; Alluisi, Coates, and Morgan, 1977; Elliott, 1960; Kibler, 1965; Mackie, 1987; Thackray, Bailey, and Touchstone, 1977). Their concerns arise mainly from three observations:

1. laboratory vigilance tasks rarely resemble their real-world counterparts;

2. when real-world tasks are adequately simulated, the results often differ from laboratory findings; and

3. there are "few, if any, troublesome vigilance decrements in the operational tasks of the real world" (Adams, 1987 p. 737).

Although admitting that a large body of important psychological knowledge has accrued from laboratory vigilance research, Wiener (1987) cautioned that vigilance must be studied in more complex and operationally valid environments. He noted that real-world vigilance tasks usually involve highly trained and experienced individuals working long hours on critical tasks with relatively low signal rates.

Unfortunately, conducting research in such environments, without impeding or disrupting ongoing activity, is often difficult. Measurement techniques need to be nonintrusive, experimental protocols must be consistent with the demands of the workplace, and the results have to be relevant (and helpful) to the individuals being studied.

We have had the opportunity to study such a real-world vigilance task (not a simulation) under daily operational conditions, with control over several factors. One function of North American Aerospace Defence (NORAD) in North Bay, Ontario, is to identify all aircraft entering Canadian airspace. This is accomplished by visually detecting potential intruders from information presented on display consoles and correlating the detected targets with logged aircraft flight plans. If the targets do not correlate with logged flight data, then interceptor aircraft may be scrambled to visually identify the transgressor.

Because the entire process depends on rapid initial detection by the surveillance operators, it is important to have a good understanding of the factors influencing detection performance in this operational environment.

The Air Surveillance Task and Environment

Canadian NORAD Region's air surveillance has been continuously maintained for 35 years and involves monitoring returns from an array of radars covering Canada's eastern, western, and northern territories. The radar information is data-linked to Canadian NORAD Region headquarters in North Bay.

Canada's area of radar coverage is divided into two geographic regions, Canada East and Canada West, the surveillance of which is given to two squadrons that physically, functionally, and operationally are independent. The air picture is updated every 12 s by NORAD computers, which must fuse and correlate all radar data to eliminate redundant echoes reflected from adjacent radar sites. Each geographic region is then subdivided into zones that can be displayed on individual surveillance consoles. The display consoles are round, monochrome (green phosphor), and vector scanned. Air surveillance operators do not monitor returns from individual radars; they monitor fused information of geographic zones serviced by multiple radars. To represent aircraft movement, the seven most recent (fused) radar returns are sequentially displayed every 2 s. This leaves a blip trail, or track, showing an aircraft's heading and speed.

The surveillance operator's task is to detect these tracks and direct the computer to tag them and assign them track numbers. The operators are not responsible for identifying the tracks, only for detecting them. Depending on the type of aircraft and its intention, a track can have one of two "signatures." Aircraft equipped with transponders emit status and identification signals that are received by the radars, interpreted by NORAD computers, and displayed on the consoles with a diamond symbol.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Vigilance Latencies to Aircraft Detection among NORAD Surveillance Operators


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?