The Big Beef Backlash

By Lee, B. J. | Newsweek International, June 9, 2008 | Go to article overview

The Big Beef Backlash


Lee, B. J., Newsweek International


Byline: B. J. Lee

America and South Korea have much to gain from their big trade deal, but may kill it for silly reasons.

A year ago, Seoul and Washington cheerfully celebrated the signing of a trade deal that looked like a major victory for the friends of globalization. This deal opens doors between top trading powers that already deal heavily with each other. America is South Korea's second largest trading partner, and South Korea is America's seventh largest. For Washington, this would be the biggest deal since Bill Clinton closed the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. Struck after 14 months of tug-of-war negotiations, it would further reduce tariffs and other barriers, widening a trade channel that Asian rivals of South Korea, like Japan and China, would likely feel compelled to match--giving global trade new momentum at a time when multilateral global-trade talks at the WTO are stalled.

That was then. A year later, a backlash in both capitals threatens to scuttle the ambitious accord. Playing to a surge in public support for trade protection, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the final Democratic contenders for the U.S. presidency, oppose congressional ratification of the FTA, citing its damage to American manufacturers, particularly automakers. And in South Korea the passion is even stronger: every night thousands of citizens stage candlelight vigils to protest their government's recent decision to allow U.S. beef imports, which they claim are prone to mad-cow disease. Amid the growing anti-American sentiment, opposition parties have joined hands to keep the National Assembly from approving the FTA. "In both countries, the FTA issue is being politicized," says Huh Yoon, a trade expert at Seoul's Sogang University. "Despite its economic benefits, political motives threaten to kill the deal."

It would be a costly failure. For Korean manufacturers the deal would mean easier access to the United States, their No. 2 export market, after China. Higher exports of autos, electronics and textiles could add 6 percent to South Korea's GDP by 2018, according to government forecasts. On the American side, farmers and cattle growers as well as banking and other service providers would gain. Experts believe that the U.S.-Korea agreement could also grease the wheels of commerce across the Pacific, as the deal will force Japan and China to lower their trade barriers against the United States. "Through the FTA with Korea, the U.S. can increase its presence in the whole of Asia," says Chang Jae Chul, a researcher at the Samsung Economic Research Institute. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Big Beef Backlash
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.