Senate Unit Passes Takings Bill

Nation's Cities Weekly, December 25, 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Senate Unit Passes Takings Bill

The Senate Judiciary committee narrowly passed and sent to the full Senate NLC-opposed federal takings legislation. The bill, S. 605, the "Omnibus Property Rights Act of 1995," would mandate federal payments to property owners when any federal agency action resulted in a 33 percent reduction in the value of an affected portion of property. The bill, if enacted, could significantly increase the federal deficit as well as impact municipal land use and zoning authority. The bill, authored by Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah.), Phil Gramm (R-Tex.) and Bob Dole (R-Kans.), proposes a "kitchen sink" approach to "takings" that broadly defines property as not only land and water, as in the House bill, but as buildings, fixtures, property defined by contract, intellectual property, securities and business profits. The bill would require that federal agencies prepare a "taking impact analysis" before issuing or promulgating any regulation, policy, or proposed legislation. Agencies would also have to review existing regulations and re-promulgate those that result in a "taking" under the bill.

Municipal Impact

The measure, S. 605, and similar "takings" compensation and assessment bills, if enacted at the federal and state level, could have the following negative impacts on cities and towns:

* The same groups that are pushing for legislative action at the federal level are also active in supporting state "takings" legislative proposals. Any legislation enacted at the federal level could set a precedent for state legislation which would impose similar requirements and restrictions on the actions of state and local governments. State Municipal Leagues in Colorado, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire and Wyoming, just to name a few, have opposed "takings" proposals in their states. The types of local government actions which might be substantially restricted by "takings" legislation include local zoning and planning classifications of land; local regulation of business activity; and local affordable housing programs.

* "Takings" legislation, both assessment and compensation, could create a new federal entitlement spending program with unforeseen consequences for the federal deficit. Taxpayers would be forced to pay for these new government expenditures, as well as for the burgeoning bureaucracy and cumbersome paperwork that would ensue. For example, a study done in New Harnpshire of similar "takings" bills pending in the state legislature found that such a bill could cost a town like Dunbarton around $2.8 million, or a city like Laconia around $8.5 million. A similar study done in the state of Washington on the state's property rights initiative estimated that the cost to local governments of the legislation would range between $3.8 and $11 million annually.

* The bill and similar bills could increase litigation among levels of government and private property owners. The bill would require compensation to a property owner by a federal agency for a reduction in the value of the property when a local law regulating the private property is the result of a federal mandate. However, the difficulty in determining whether a local law is actually required by federal law would likely cause substantial litigation among aU levels of government and private property owners. This could impose increased costs on cities and towns for litigation expenses, attorneys' fees, and, possibly, shared compensation awards.

* While most of the current proposals appear to apply only to federal government actions, success of these measures may create a political environment in which "takings" decisions of courts are more restrictive of governmental power, such as local government permitting and zoning.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Senate Unit Passes Takings Bill


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?