With 2000 Comes a Big Challenge in Bank Systems

By Barthel, Matt | American Banker, March 7, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

With 2000 Comes a Big Challenge in Bank Systems

Barthel, Matt, American Banker

For some, the end of the decade conjures thoughts of a promising new millennium. But to many computer system operators, the vision may be of an apocalypse.

When the clock strikes midnight and 1999 turns to 2000, thousands of computers will suddenly seize up or seriously malfunction.

The problem stems from the fact that computer programming standards were set without regard to the change. Because years are entered in two-digit shorthand, "00" would be read as 1900, not 2000.

The answer lies in expanding the year space to four digits - a complex and expensive programming challenge.

The predictions of doom have spawned heated debates among systems experts and consultants. The issue has important implications for banks, because they deal in financial accounts and instruments that are heavily dependent on date references.

Many bank executives are having a hard time taking the "2000 crisis" seriously, but consultants and technology companies are doing their best to change that. A cottage industry has grown up around solving the problem, and its rhetoric is hard to ignore.

Some call the preparations the largest cross-industry computer project ever. Reprogramming cost estimates range between 50 cents and $1.50 for every line of code on companies' systems.

Estimates of the aggregate modification cost worldwide run into the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Bankers who have begun facing the challenge said some of the talk is hyperbole - a scare tactic designed to get businesses to buy the necessary support services. But the bankers do not deny that the situation requires attention.

And the consequences could be dire for those that do not begin making changes soon.

"If this is not addressed, it will bring business to a grinding halt," said Brian Robbins, vice president of information technology architecture at Chemical Banking Corp. (He will hold the same position with Chase Manhattan Corp. when the two banks complete their merger.)

On most bank systems, today's date in computer code would be 960307. The same date four years from now would be 000307.

Older systems would logically assume that any loan with a maturity date beyond 2000 is seriously past due.

The remedy - expanding the two-digit year fields to four digits - is time-consuming and can be expensive, bankers said, although the costs would vary widely from bank to bank.

In general, those with older hardware and software have more work to do, because only the newest components of bank computer systems tend to be ready for the conversion.

Experts note that the problem requires modification not only of computer applications, but also of computer files. Thus, a bank cannot just modify its demand deposit software, it must also make sure that files, such as those tracking bounced checks, acknowledge the calendar change.

James McCann, year-2000 business manager at EDS Corp.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

With 2000 Comes a Big Challenge in Bank Systems


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?