Property Rights and Wrongs

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 26, 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Property Rights and Wrongs


Byline: James Huffman, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

In 1978, Wayne and Jean Hage purchased a 7,000-acre ranch in Nevada. With the ranch they acquired grazing permits on large tracts of public land and rights to water diverted from some of those lands. In accordance with their grazing permits and pursuant to their state-recognized water rights, the Hages constructed a variety of improvements, including several miles of pipeline, 298 miles of fence and 634 miles of roads and trails.

For its part, the government authorized the Nevada Department of Wildlife to release elk onto the Hage grazing lands, fenced waters owned by Hage to exclude cattle (but not Elk who can jump fences), made 70 visits to the Hage ranch and sent 40 letters alleging a wide array of mostly minor infractions of regulations, refused to renew some of Mr. Hage's grazing permits, prevented Mr. Hage from accessing public lands to maintain his water supply, prosecuted him (unsuccessfully) for trespass and twice impounded his cattle.

Mr. Hage filed a lawsuit in 1991 claiming his property rights had been taken without just compensation in contravention of the Fifth Amendment takings clause. Seventeen long years later, on June 6, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims decided the United States owes the estate of Wayne and Jean Hage $4.2 million. With interest and attorney's fees the total government bill will be several times that amount, but still it is not a lot of money for a government eager to spend more than $300 million on a bridge to nowhere.

But paying what would have been a much lower price to purchase Mr. Hage's rights in 1991 did not occur to the federal government. Instead it engaged in a 17-year legal battle that outlived the Hages. The government's purpose in this marathon was to prove that the Hages did not have the property rights they claimed. Lest Mr. Hage, who could not afford the cost to redeem his cattle, take advantage of the government, the National Wildlife Federation, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Nevada Wildlife Federation and the Sierra Club all weighed in as amici curiae in support of the government's position.

There is no mystery why the nation's leading environmental groups weighed in against the Hages.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Property Rights and Wrongs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?