Fighting Fire with a Broken Teacup: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa's Land-Redistribution Program *

By Moseley, William G.; McCusker, Brent | The Geographical Review, July 2008 | Go to article overview

Fighting Fire with a Broken Teacup: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa's Land-Redistribution Program *


Moseley, William G., McCusker, Brent, The Geographical Review


**********

Of all of the cases of unequal land distribution in the world, South Africa is easily one of the starkest examples of inequity relative to population. The statistics on apartheid-era land concentration are widely known as a result of antiapartheid campaigns: 71 percent of the population is confined to roughly 13 percent of the country's total land area (Borras 2003, 384). This lopsided distribution resulted not only from the policies of the Afrikaaner-led nationalist government (1948-1994) but also from centuries of land alienation in favor of white settlers (see, for example, Bundy 1979).

In 1994 the first democratically elected government, led by the African National Congress (ANC), promised fundamental change and announced a goal of redistributing 30 percent of white-controlled agricultural land to the majority black population by 1999 (ANC 1994, 22). Although it enunciated laudable goals, the first attempt at land reform (1994-1999) produced disappointing results. By 2000 little land had actually changed hands, and observers noted that redress proceeded very slowly (Turner and Ibsen 2000). Critics from the left challenged the market-based redistribution mechanism, and those from the right argued that the new black landowners either underutilized or mismanaged their land.

In 1999, under intense pressure from all parties, Thoko Didiza, minister of agriculture and land affairs in the administration of then newly elected President Thabo Mbeki, announced a moratorium on all land-redistribution projects until the government could formulate new guidelines that would both accelerate land redistribution and stay within a market-oriented approach. The department revised its land-reform policy, moving away from a model of land redistribution to alleviate poverty toward one aimed at promoting a class of black commercial farmers. The major vehicle for this effort was the Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) program, which had largely replaced the Settlement / Land Acquisition Grant (SLAG) by late 2000.

In this article we document and analyze the impact of both of these land-redistribution programs in South Africa's Limpopo and Western Cape Provinces. By examining a cross-section of projects we attempt to explain why land redistribution in the two provinces has not fulfilled the overall programmatic goals of broader land-reform policy. We further develop a political ecology of blocked land-reform possibilities to theorize why progress has been so limited to date.

POLITICAL ECOLOGIES OF LAND REFORM

Researchers who employ a political ecology approach to studying human-environment interactions continually demonstrate its flexibility as an analytical framework. We hesitate to describe political ecology as a theory, or even as a coherent and singular concept. For instance, although reviews of political ecology have become prolific and refined (Bryant and Bailey 1997; Blaikie 1999; Zimmerer and Bassett 2003; Moseley and Logan 2004; Peet and Watts 2004; Robbins 2004), debate continues over its definition and practice. Some authors focus on politics and economics (Peet and Watts 2004; Bryant and Bailey 1997; Bassett 2004); others emphasize ecology (Zimmerer and Bassett 2003; Vasquez-Leon and Liverman 2004). Most political ecologists, however, generally agree that this field "combines the concerns of ecology and a broadly defined political economy" (Blaikie and Brookfield 1987, 17).

We wish to avoid "black boxing" change; that is, simply extolling political ecology as a framework that explains everything--and therefore nothing. For us, three key concepts help frame the political ecologies of land reform: discourse, marginalization, and structure/agency. Poststructural political ecologists focus on the power of discourse, and environmental narratives more specifically, to shape environmental policies and programs (Leach and Mearns 1996; Bassett and Koli Bi 2000; Moseley and Laris 2008).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fighting Fire with a Broken Teacup: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa's Land-Redistribution Program *
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.