Is Fraud a Problem in Governmental Entities?

By Graves, Sharron M.; Lilley, Treba et al. | Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, January 2004 | Go to article overview

Is Fraud a Problem in Governmental Entities?


Graves, Sharron M., Lilley, Treba, Lozano, Marsh Miguel, Iii., Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal


ABSTRACT

The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners estimates the loss from occupational fraud and abuse at approximately $600 billion per year, or about $4,500 per employee. The FBI has labeled fraud the fastest growing crime, and accordingly allocates a large portion of its resources to fighting fraud. There are many types of fraud, but all can be classified as those committed against the corporation or those committed on behalf of the organization.

This article reports the results of a survey developed by the authors and sent to members of the Government Finance Officers Association of Texas via electronic mail. Responses were received from 54 governmental entities. The results of the survey are compared to the KPMG 1998 U. S. Fraud Survey to determine if the fraud statistics from governmental entities echoed those from a national survey which primarily included large corporations.

With the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the implementation of SAS 99, management and auditors of publicly held companies will become more adept at recognizing fraud risk factors. Hopefully, some of this awareness and strengthening of internal control systems will transfer to the governmental sector.

INTRODUCTION

During most of the 19th century, fraud was somewhat ignored by both public and private companies. As a result, fraud thrived and cost companies an untold amount of money. At one time, the U. S. Chamber of Commerce estimated that the cost of employee and management fraud exceeded $100 billion annually (Davia, 2000). Other groups estimated a much higher figure.

In 1996 the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) published its first Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. At that time, the results indicated fraud cost U. S. organizations more than $400 billion per year or roughly $9 per day per employee or 6 percent of the company's total annual revenue (The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 1996). Recently, the 2002 Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse was released. The latest report was more extensive than the first and was based on 663 occupational fraud cases which were reported to the ACFE by Certified Fraud Examiners and accounted for more than $7 billion in losses. Only six years after the first fraud study, the ACFE now estimates the loss from occupational fraud and abuse at approximately $600 billion per year, or about $4,500 per employee (The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2002). The percentage of fraud losses remained relatively constant at 3 percent of revenues. However, during the six-year period the Gross Domestic Product increased from approximately $7 trillion to about $10 trillion which accounted for the $200 billion increase in losses. For purposes of this research, occupational fraud and abuse is defined as: "The use of one's occupation for personal enrichment through the deliberate misuse or misapplication of the employing organization's resources or assets" (Wells, 1997). Fraud embraces a wide variety of actions committed by company employees from the chief executive officer to the lowest level employee and ranges from sophisticated investment schemes to petty theft. Abuse covers a multitude of activities often accepted by both employees and employers as a cost of doing business. Abusive activities include such things as padding expense accounts, taking long, unapproved lunch breaks and employees falsely claiming sick leave. Obviously, flagrant abuses are normally reprimanded or prosecuted, but lessor offenses are often overlooked.

The FBI has labeled fraud the fastest growing crime and, accordingly, allocates a large portion of its resources to fraud investigation. On a continual basis, the bureau is investigating several hundred fraud and embezzlement cases involving amounts in excess of $100,000 per case (Albrecht, 2003).

At the Principles of Fraud Examination Conference held in June 2003, Toby Bishop, ACFE President and CEO, was asked the question, "What is the state of fraud in this country? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Is Fraud a Problem in Governmental Entities?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.