Risk Management Standards for Retail Payment Systems

By Heller, H. Robert | American Banker, May 9, 1996 | Go to article overview

Risk Management Standards for Retail Payment Systems


Heller, H. Robert, American Banker


This article is adapted from an address at the recent Payments '96 Conference in San Francisco.

Central banks are increasingly concerned about payments system risk and have actively encouraged private-sector operators to reduce their exposures. A key question is whether the risk management standards that have been promulgated for large-value networks should also be applied to retail oriented systems, such as credit cards.

The central banks of the most important countries in the financial world, the Group of 10, mutually agreed upon minimum standards in the 1990 "Lamfalussy Report." In 1994, the Federal Reserve Board issued a policy statement adopting these standards and instituted a further set of risk management principles that are applicable to large-value payments systems like Fed Wire and Chips.

The Fed defines a "large-value" system as one that routinely settles more than $500 million a day. This is regularly exceeded by the large card based retail payments systems. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve made clear that the established standards should apply to all networks, though batch type systems like the cards and automated clearing house were exempted for the time being.

The central question is whether the differences between large-value and small-value systems are so significant that they constitute a difference in kind rather than in degree, therefore exempting retail systems from the strict Lamfalussy standards.

There tends to be an inverse relationship between the number of transactions in a payments system and their total value. Visa and MasterCard executed about 15 billion transactions in 1994, while Chips and Fed Wire exceeded 100 million.

The total value moved over Chips and Fed Wire exceeded $500 trillion in 1994, compared with Visa's and MasterCard's half a trillion dollars. The large- value payments systems move more funds in a day than the retail systems do in a year.

These disparities are also reflected in the average transaction size: about $6 million in Chips, $3 million on Fed Wire, but only $70 in the bank card systems. Would one follow the same safety rules on a conquest of Mount Everest as on a molehill? Hardly.

To make the same point in still a different way: In no country for which the Bank for International Settlements reports the relevant data do card payments constitute more than one-third of 1% of the total value of cashless payments.

It can therefore hardly be argued that retail payments systems present the same kinds of systemic problems as the large-value systems. Nevertheless, retail systems may represent some moderate risks that should be monitored and contained.

Can the retail systems meet the Lamfalussy standards? If yes, this would certainly be beneficial; if no, we must ask ourselves what, if anything, should be done about it.

One of the standards retail payments systems can meet, Lamfalussy IV, calls for objective and publicly disclosed criteria for membership and fair and open access to the system. The bylaws of the various retail payments organizations spell out these conditions in detail and most should be in compliance with this standard.

Another standard, Lamfalussy VI, calls for the operational reliability of technical systems and availability of backup facilities.

Many retail systems have set and met standards of 99.99% operational reliability and should have no difficulty in meeting the Lamfalussy criterion. But 0.01% downtime amounts to 52 minutes during the year. If that occurs during the peak Christmas season, consumers might be very unhappy. However, this is not a regulatory issue but a service quality issue that can be left to the free market.

Lamfalussy II calls for participants in a netting system to fully understand the various risks to which they might be exposed. This is certainly a reasonable requirement that any financial institution can and should meet. The various retail payments systems have done much to educate their members through seminars and the publication of appropriate manuals.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Risk Management Standards for Retail Payment Systems
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.