Privatizing Social Security

By Schnepper, Jeff A. | USA TODAY, May 1996 | Go to article overview

Privatizing Social Security


Schnepper, Jeff A., USA TODAY


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

SOCIAL SECURITY accounts for half the income for 60% of American retirees. In 1995, its trust fund ran a $485,000,000,000 "surplus," but that surplus is borrowed by the Treasury each year, resulting in a huge stack of IOUs which must be paid back, starting around 2010, when the baby boomer generation begins to retire.

Under the Social Security System, the taxes paid by today's workers fund the benefits for current retirees. As long as the labor force grows faster than the number of beneficiaries, the system works. The ratio of workers to recipients is 3.3-to-one. However, when the 77,000,000 people born between 1946 and 1964 begin to retire, it will be crunch time; the ratio is projected to fall to two-to-one within the next 35 years.

America is getting grayer. Today, one in eight Americans is over 65; by 2005, it will be one in five. The 65 and older population is projected to rise from 34,000,000 to 37,000,000 by 2005; 46,000,000 by 2015; 53,000,000 by 2020; and 70,000,000 by 2030. A 65-year-old in 1940 had a life expectancy of another 13 years. Today, it is 16 years for men and 20 for women. Coming medical advances will continue to raise life expectancy.

Benefits, in relation to costs, already have been reduced. A person retiring in 1980 recouped all Social Security taxes paid within three years, including the share paid by the employer. Retirees in 1995 will take an average of 12 years, 15 if they paid the maximum tax. By 2015, the break-even point will average 19 years, 28 for maximum payers.

The above break-even point is based upon current rates, which will not hold. Retirement age is set to reach 67 in 2015 and can be expected to be raised to 69 or 70. The wage base surely will be increased each year. In 1996, it is $62,700, up from $61,200 in 1995 and $60,600 in 1994. Expect the wage rate to increase as well, in addition to a scaling back on annual cost of living adjustments. According to Gary and Aldona Robbins of the Institute for Policy Innovation, "Eliminating the Social Security and Medicare deficits through payroll tax increases would require a doubling of the current 15.3% payroll tax in the next 35 years." Moreover, "Covering the deficits through increases in personal income taxes would require an across the board 75% increase by 2030."

What can be done? Senators Bob Kerry (D.-Neb.) and Alan Simpson (R.-Wyo.) have introduced a comprehensive Social Security reform package that would allow workers to divert payroll taxes to their own retirement accounts, adjust the Consumer Price Index, cut Social Security cost of living increases, and implement other retirement system changes. According to Kerry, the plan would "help the United States avert a fiscal catastrophe and revolutionize our economy and the way we plan for retirement by placing a new, and overdue, emphasis on national savings."

Under the Personal Investment Plan Act, workers would have the option of diverting an amount representing two percent of their Old Age Survivors and Disability Insurance payroll taxes to their personal investment plan, the assets of which could be placed in one or two investment categories. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Privatizing Social Security
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.