The Hippocratic Paradox: The Role of the Medical Profession in Capital Punishment in the United States

By Groner, Jonathan I. | Fordham Urban Law Journal, June 2008 | Go to article overview

The Hippocratic Paradox: The Role of the Medical Profession in Capital Punishment in the United States


Groner, Jonathan I., Fordham Urban Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

Although the outcome may be death, the act of the physician may be solely to provide comfort. In this case, a physician is not acting as a tool of the government; he is acting as a physician whose goals temporarily align with the goals of the government. (1)

The medical profession has been involved in capital punishment for hundreds of years. For the majority of history, this involvement has been limited to the design of execution techniques, with the primary goal of eliminating the risk of unnecessary suffering. (2) This effort on the part of physicians to make executions more humane influenced the development of the guillotine, the electric chair, the gas chamber, and lethal injection. Lethal injection, however, is unique in that it was not only designed by a physician, it was also designed to imitate a medical procedure: the intravenous induction of general anesthesia. Thus lethal injection, unlike other execution methods, not only simulates medical practice, but also uses materials and expertise that are ordinarily used for healing. This has required medical professionals (3) to become active participants in executions.

The introduction of lethal injection in the United States marked the beginning of a rapid rise in the execution rate that has only recently begun to decline. At the same time, executions by other modern methods have fallen to nearly zero. (4) Thus, lethal injection has become synonymous with capital punishment in the United States, forcing the medical profession to become an integral part of the machinery of death. Part I of this Article provides a brief background of physician involvement in capital punishment prior to the development of lethal injection and discusses the pathophysiology of various execution methods. Part II demonstrates how the introduction of lethal injection fundamentally changed capital punishment in the United States by adding a veneer of medical respectability to judicial executions. Part III concludes that the direct result of this "medicalized" execution technique has been to draw medical professionals into the death chamber in violation of national and international ethical guidelines. Part IV describes how medicalized executions create an ethical conflict--the "Hippocratic paradox." (5) This paradox exists because it is immoral for medical professionals to increase the risk of another human being suffering torture by not participating, but also immoral for medical professionals to perform executions, because such participation risks irreparable harm to the medical profession and to the community as a whole.

I. BACKGROUND: THE PHYSIOLOGY OF KILLING AND THE SEARCH FOR "HUMANE" CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

"The device strikes like lightning; the head flies, blood spouts, the man has ceased to live."

--Dr. Louis Guillotin, describing a humane execution (6)

The origin of physician involvement in legally sanctioned killing is unknown. The first, and still the most famous, physician to be associated with a specific killing technique was Dr. Louis Guillotin. (7) Torture-executions were common in Guillotin's time, including execution methods that caused multiple skeletal fractures ("breaking on the wheel"), massive full thickness burns ("burning at the stake"), and asphyxiation by spinal cord transection (hanging). (8) By comparison, beheading with a sword must have seemed quite humane. In fact, in Guillotin's day, this form of punishment was reserved for "convicted aristocrats, and occasionally for royalty." (9) Decapitation by sword, however, was exceedingly operator-dependent, and required both a strong, accurate executioner and a sharp blade for success. (10) Guillotin, in his role as a reformer of capital punishment, (11) sought to end torture-executions and suggested that the same killing technique be used regardless of the social class of the condemned. He endorsed, but did not design, the execution machinery that now so famously bears his name. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Hippocratic Paradox: The Role of the Medical Profession in Capital Punishment in the United States
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.