Energy Policy Needed ASAP, Don't Call It Manhattan Project

By Erwin, Sandra I. | National Defense, August 2008 | Go to article overview

Energy Policy Needed ASAP, Don't Call It Manhattan Project


Erwin, Sandra I., National Defense


Washington surely loves a Manhattan Project.

Calls for Manhattan Projects have almost become mandatory, especially in response to tough problems that nobody seems to know how to fix.

After U.S. troops in Iraq became targets of roadside bombs, generals urged the Pentagon to launch a Manhattan Project to counter the deadly attacks. Lawmakers also called for a Manhattan Project to expedite the delivery of armored trucks to Iraq to protect the troops. Numerous Manhattan Projects have been summoned by various congressional committees to eradicate cancer and other deadly diseases. The Department of Homeland Security laid claim to its own wish for a Manhattan Project, one aimed at protecting cyberspace from hackers and viruses.

The latest, and definitely the loudest, of the demands for a Manhattan Project has been fueled by the nation's energy crisis.

Politicians, scientists, economists and even regular citizens have rallied behind the notion that the nation needs a Manhattan Project to achieve "energy independence," "clean energy," "freedom from foreign oil," "relief at the pump"--whatever the slogan of the day might be.

What has become evidently clear amid the cacophony of cries for solutions is that the usual way of doing business in Washington is not going to help solve the energy plight. So far, this Manhattan Project that we hear about in the media 24/7 is shaping up to be yet another grab bag for special interests, and will fail to tackle systemic issues, experts warn.

"There are too many different 'vested interests' in how we deal with energy security," says Sharon Burke, a foreign policy and energy scholar at the Center for a New American Security.

In the name of "energy security," backers of nuclear power have called for investments in new plants to generate electricity. The automobile industry is hoping for federal grants to fund hydrogen-powered cars. Advocates of domestic drilling promise that only if we keep digging can the United States end its dependence on foreign oil. The coal sector is demanding more funds for carbon-capture research. Alternative energy producers guarantee that they can deliver quick results if only they can get enough tax credits.

When it comes to energy policy, decisions typically are shaped by the preferences of members of Congress, notes Josh Busby, a professor of public affairs at the University of Texas. Regional economies are dependent on the production of certain kinds of energy--coal in West Virginia, petroleum in Alaska and the Gulf Coast, biofuels in the Midwest.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Energy Policy Needed ASAP, Don't Call It Manhattan Project
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.