Deserting the Democrats: Why African-Americans and the Poor Should Make Common Cause in Their Own Party

By Wicker, Tom | The Nation, June 17, 1996 | Go to article overview

Deserting the Democrats: Why African-Americans and the Poor Should Make Common Cause in Their Own Party


Wicker, Tom, The Nation


It's familiarly argued, particularly by white Democrats who covet black votes, that only major parties can win national power, and therefore African-Americans' interests are best served by continued loyalty to the Democratic Party. Black voters help the Democrats to win elections--sometimes, anyway--and the Democrats claim to be more sympathetic to African-American interests than are the Republicans.

That's been their claim since the thirties, when the Depression, the economic promise of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, Eleanor Roosevelt's advocacy of their concerns and F.D.R.'s executive order barring racial discrimination in military industries and the federal government lured blacks en masse out of the party of Lincoln. (Roosevelt's hand was forced by A. Philip Randolph, president of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters. Randolph had threatened to lead 100,000 black demonstrators in a march on Washington if the President did not sign the executive order.) Blacks, new allegiance was cemented by the desegregation of the armed forces and by civil rights legislation pushed by non-Southern Democrats in the administrations of Truman, Kennedy and Johnson.

As integration faltered after 1966, however, and white backlash mounted, the Republicans were permitted to define racial issues, usually by denigrating what they described as black behavior--out-of-wedlock births, crime, welfare dependency--in order to win white political support. Little attention was paid by either party to blacks, economic needs or, in consequence, to those of poor whites. As a predictable result, whites mostly voted Republican, blacks stayed largely with the less hostile Democrats and the poor of both races stayed poor and often got poorer.

Black support for Democrats in recent decades has been a mixed blessing, however, since the party consistently lost presidential elections, not least because African-Americans and their party had become so closely identified with each other. The last Democratic presidential candidate to carry a majority of the nation's white males--who cast a massive number of votes--was Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

Recognizing this "image" problem, white Democrats have sought to "move to the center," trying to suppress race and placing emphasis on other issues the Republicans have already claimed: the "middle class," tax cuts, crime and the like. Blacks loyal to the party have had little choice but to go along with this Democratic de-emphasis of their interests.

Even this copycat strategy did not work nationally until 1992, however, when a lagging economy, George Bush's political ineptitude and Ross Perot's weird candidacy helped put Bill Clinton in the White House, just barely. By then, both parties had effectively abandoned integration as national policy, beyond what had already been achieved (and even that came under fire in the Reagan/Bush administrations). Neither party pressed hard for further racial gains or pushed for enforcement of what had been done, and both treated racial aspirations largely as a patronage problem to be handled by Cabinet appointments and other political spoils. Most important, neither party was willing or professed to see the necessity to mount an attack on the economic trends that had created the inner-city ghetto and that also were keeping many whites and non-ghetto blacks in poverty and hopelessness.

Thus, today's uneasy alliance between African-Americans and the Democratic Party of Clinton is a world apart from the sixties coalition of non-Southern Democrats and civil rights leaders. Then, a realizable goal--desegregation in the South--was shared on both sides. Today, the alliance stands for little of real benefit to blacks.

For this and other reasons, an early repudiation of the Democratic Party by African-Americans would be in their own and the nation's interest. That would provide a base and a platform for a radical new party that might revive racial integration and enlarge economic opportunity for poor Americans of all races. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Deserting the Democrats: Why African-Americans and the Poor Should Make Common Cause in Their Own Party
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.