Subsidiarity and Sphere-Sovereignty: A Match Made in ...?

By Van Til, Kent A. | Theological Studies, September 2008 | Go to article overview

Subsidiarity and Sphere-Sovereignty: A Match Made in ...?


Van Til, Kent A., Theological Studies


THE QUEST FOR A CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ORDER has long occupied the church. What should a Christian society look like? Is there such a thing as a Christian society, or might there potentially be many Christian societies? What is the role of the church, state, and other institutions in society? Everyone from Diggers and Dominicans, to Cistercians and Calvinists, has variously defined answers to these questions. To say that there is variety in both definitions and practice hardly captures the wide range of options that have grown within the church. Yet, amidst this diversity, two significant traditions, the Roman Catholic and Dutch Calvinist, have converged in surprising ways within the last century and a half.

While the theology of the Roman Catholic Church has always had a social component, its official social teachings, so defined, are often dated from Pope Leo XIII's Rerum novarum of 1891. Leo believed that the increasingly secular European states were pushing the church out of civil society. Hoping to reassert the church's authority and role, Leo addressed the social issue of the laboring class of Europe. The second tradition, Dutch Calvinism, has also reflected on issues of church, state, and secularization. The teachings of this tradition are not formal teachings of the highest church official, but theological reflections on issues of the day by its church leaders. Abraham Kuyper (1837-1920), a leading theologian in this tradition and prime minister of the Netherlands, developed a social-theological model he called "sphere sovereignty." (1)

There are a number of reasons why these two traditions are parallel and warrant further investigation. The origins of each lie in post-Enlightenment Western Europe of the late 19th century. Both attempt to respond to the political changes in the church/state/society relations of that period. By this time, the medieval guilds had disappeared. In their place was the contractual agreement between corporations and labor. In this context of industrialization, class conflict was a common characteristic of European society. A watchword of the French Revolution, "no God, no master!" still resonated in Europe. The revolts of 1848 were still living memories, and Marx's call, "Workers of the world to unite!" was well known and often heeded. It seemed that the individual stood alone before the state, or industrial capitalist, with few intermediate bodies between. Religion was shoved into a spiritual corner, and governmental elites expected the church's silence or complicity in social issues. In response to these conditions, both church traditions were compelled to articulate new approaches to the social order. The Catholic Church in many instances had been a state church that now found itself pushed from its earlier prominence. On the other hand, Kuyper's church, Gereformerde Kerken in Nederland, seceded from the national Nederlandse Hervormde Kerk in protest over state regulation of ecclesiastical affairs.

Today, the conditions that led these traditions to develop social theologies have changed, but recent conflicts may have made resolution of issues of church, state, and society more vital than ever. The question of how religion can and should function in pluralistic societies arises in many hotly debated political issues today: homosexual marriage, abortion, education vouchers, etc. In other parts of the world, blood is spilling over the question of whether a religion should direct the state. It thus seems imperative that the church continue to develop approaches that honor the role of faith in society, while recognizing the plurality of powers and voices within society. By a "pluralistic" social model I mean an ordering of society in which neither church, nor state, nor individual, nor marketplace sets the standard or holds controlling authority within that society. Rather, a pluralistic society permits diverse groups and institutions to operate within a common societal framework. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Subsidiarity and Sphere-Sovereignty: A Match Made in ...?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.