Predictors of Adolescent A.A. Affiliation

By Hohman, Melinda; LeCroy, Craig Winston | Adolescence, Summer 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Predictors of Adolescent A.A. Affiliation

Hohman, Melinda, LeCroy, Craig Winston, Adolescence

Thousands of teenagers are treated each year in in-patient or residential settings for drug and alcohol dependency. The majority of these programs use the traditional treatment model, also known as the Minnesota Model (Littrell, 1991). This model emphasizes addiction as a disease where one achieves recovery through abstinence, and that one must participate in a support group such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) in order to maintain this abstinence. Patients attend AA while hospitalized and are encouraged to continue their attendance upon discharge. AA itself has seen a tremendous growth in membership over the last decade. Currently there are over one million members in the United States alone (About AA, 1990) with approximately 3% of its members being under 21 years of age.

While not every adolescent who receives treatment will affiliate with AA, it is important to study the characteristics of those who do. Because referral to AA is a routine discharge plan, it may help mental health practitioners to know which of their clients may be more likely to join this self-help program. This subject is particularly pertinent because it has not been investigated with the adolescent population.

Various studies have researched A.A. affiliation with the goal of describing who joins AA in the hope that treatment providers could utilize "a more informed basis for treatment planning" (O'Leary, Calsyn, Haddock, & Freeman, 1980, p. 137). An outline of these studies can be found in Table 1.

It is virtually impossible to define the population of abstinent alcoholics, both those in AA and those not so affiliated. One of the strictest traditions of AA is that of anonymity of its members. As can be seen, the samples used in most of these studies were mainly hospitalized, adult males. Using currently hospitalized patients may pose problems because of long-term cognitive impairment (Gorski & Miller, 1982) and what Marlatt (1985) refers to as the abstinence violation effect, which is intense shame, guilt, and hopelessness that A.A. members may feel upon relapse and re-entry into treatment. This effect may bias the responses of the recently relapsed patients who are readmitted. Of all these studies, only Hurlburt, Gade and Fuqua (1983) specified race. Four of the studies used AA to recruit participants, leading to a self-selected sample. The study by Alford (1980) was a follow-up that had a somewhat better sample in that all the respondents had received the same intervention.

As a few of the researchers pointed out, it is hard to ascertain whether respondents had the characteristics studied prior to affiliation with AA or if AA caused them to develop. An example of this is Mindlin's (1964) findings of "less socially ill at ease" and "less loneliness."

At least four of the studies (Fontana, Dowds, & Bethel 1976; Greg-son & Taylor, 1977; Reilly & Sugarman, 1967; Trice, 1959) are similar in their finding that attributes could be categorized as external personality characteristics, such as use of more external sources of authority, religiosity, and formalistic thinking.

Many findings among the studies were contradictory; for example, Boscarino (1980) found less alcohol-related problems, while O'Leary et al. (1980) and Vaillant (1983) found more alcohol-related problems. Hurlburt et al. (1983) found that the AA affiliates were "less emotional" and Reilly and Sugarman (1967) found them to be more sensitive and concerned with acceptance. (See Table 1.)

This review of the literature also indicates that the area of AA affiliation has mainly been researched among adult samples. It was found that females, extroverts, and those who have suffered more alcohol-related problems are more likely to affiliate with A.A.

While A.A. affiliation has not been studied with adolescents, treatment outcome studies provide some relevant information. Hoffman [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED] and Kaplan (1991) found in a study of treated alcoholic adolescents that those whose parents had participated in treatment were more likely to participate in a support group, and the less the teens' peers used drugs, the more likely they were to achieve abstinence.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Predictors of Adolescent A.A. Affiliation


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?