On Replications in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case

By Fuess, Scott M., Jr. | Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Spring 1996 | Go to article overview

On Replications in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case


Fuess, Scott M., Jr., Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics


"It is important that econometric replications be taken as seriously as replications in the experimental sciences."

R.A. Mittelstaedt and T.S. Zorn (1984, p. 14).

INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW

In business and economics research, support often is expressed for the concept of econometric replication. For example, Mittelstaedt and Zorn (1984) argue that a result is not worth knowing if it cannot be reproduced. Despite such a declaration, this type of research apparently has been regarded with ambivalence. Reproducing other researchers' findings may be viewed as less creative than generating new results with original research (Dewald, Thursby, and Anderson, 1986; Kane, 1984).(1)

In their analysis of the market for econometric studies, Feigenbaum and Levy (1993a) argue that there may be data externalities: would-be replicators may not have access to data used in original studies.(2) Dewald et al. (1986) argue that reproducibility is a public good. Readers benefit from knowing whether empirical results can be supported, but it is difficult for a researcher to assess how each reader would value a confirmation. Thus, Dewald et al. and Feigenbaum and Levy have urged journals to adopt policies that promote reproducibility.

Editors have acknowledged the importance of reproducing results. Frisch (1933) wrote in the first volume of Econometrica that its articles also should include raw data. But editorial attention to reproducibility has been a comparatively recent occurrence. It is only in the past decade or so that journals such as American Economic Review and Journal of Money, Credit and Banking have requested data and computer programs from authors so that articles may be duplicated.(3) Since 1993 the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank has made data from its Review articles available to the public (Anderson and Dewald, 1994).

Some journals have treated replication as more than an auditing device. In response to a suggestion by Feige (1975), the editors of Journal of Political Economy (1975) created a "Confirmations and Contradictions" section in the journal. The editorial board of Industrial & Labor Relations Review (1993, p. 227) has declared that it will "give serious consideration to publishing replication studies of a kind that we have, for the most part, rejected in the past." But the Review has qualified its policy, stating that replications should be brief and that a topic must be deemed to be extraordinarily important.

Although some have done so, most journals do not explicitly encourage econometric replications, and such studies have been rare.(4) Hubbard and Vetter (1991) analyze four prominent finance journals and find that only 5.3 percent of their articles are replications, accounting for 4.3 percent of journal space.(5) For three leading economics journals, Hubbard and Vetter (1992) report nearly identical results.(6) They discuss similar findings of Reid, Soley, and Wimmer (1981) for advertising research and how Brown and Coney (1976) find only 2 percent of marketing publications to be replications.

In the Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics (QJBE) Kane (1984) urges editors to invite econometric replications. In the same issue the board of editors announced a new policy, which departs from other journals: the QJBE would give priority to publishing replication studies. Arguing that replication had been neglected, the editors affirm that the journal would give particular consideration to this type of research.

Since adopting its policy, the QJBE has published several replication studies. Hubbard and Vetter (1992) examine a random sample of 52 empirical articles appearing in the journal between 1984 and 1989. This sample represents about one-third of QJBE articles published during this interval. They find that 17.3 percent of the sample consists of replications, a larger proportion than in other journals.

Given the QJBE's unique policy, Feigenbaum and Levy (1993b) write that analysis of the journal would be particularly intriguing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

On Replications in Business and Economics Research: The QJBE Case
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.