Norton V. SUWA and the Unraveling of Federal Public Land Planning

By Blumm, Michael C.; Bosse, Sherry L. | Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview

Norton V. SUWA and the Unraveling of Federal Public Land Planning


Blumm, Michael C., Bosse, Sherry L., Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum


ABSTRACT

In 2004, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled in Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Association (SUWA), that environmentalists could not obtain injunctive relief against the failure of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to regulate growing off-road vehicle (ORV) use in federal wilderness study areas in Utah, despite a statutory directive that BLM prevent "impairment" of such areas, and despite BLM's promises in its land plan that it would monitor ORV use and close the areas if warranted. The Court acknowledged that the Administrative Procedure Act authorized federal courts to compel action in the face of agency inaction. However, the Court held that BLM's failure to act to prevent impairment was not actionable because Congress had not directed BLM to take a "discrete" action, instead leaving the agency with considerable discretion as to how to prevent impairment. The decision in SUWA has produced widespread ramifications: federal land managers have employed it to successfully insulate from judicial review a wide variety of federal actions as well as inactions. Moreover, the Bush Administration seized upon the decision as a justification for redefining national forest land plans as aspirational in nature, without making any binding commitments as to particular authorized activities or land suitability. The Administration also moved to eliminate environmental review of national forest plans, claiming that, under its redefinition, plans produce no environmental effects, an effort that was subsequently stalled by the courts.

This article discusses these developments, maintaining that they are inconsistent with the congressional commitment to federal land planning made in 1976 in both the Federal Land Management and Policy Act and the National Forest Management Act. Thirty years ago, Congress created modern federal land planning as the cornerstone of greater public involvement in public land decision making. SUWA and its aftermath have destroyed that vision, making public land plans virtually irrelevant and a large waste of taxpayer dollars. If effective public participation in federal land planning requires that the public be able to enforce the promises made in land plans, Congress must amend the authorizing statutes to restore federal land plans as legally significant commitments of public resources.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  Background: Resource Planning on the Public Lands
        A. National Forest Planning
        B. BLM Land Planning
        C. Federal Investment in Land Planning
II.  Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance: Undermining
     Federal Land Planning
         A. SUWA's Predecessors: Lujan v. National Wildlife
            Federation and Ohio Forestry Association v. Sierra
            Club
         B. The Conflict in SUWA: Unregulated ORV Use in
             WSAs
         C. The Supreme Court's Decision
III. SUWA's Effect on Litigation in the Federal Courts
         A. Environmental Challenges Precluded by SUWA
         B. Supplemental EISs on Land Use Plans After SUWA
         C. Land Plan Challenges Not Barred by SUWA
         D. SUWA's Litigation Legacy
IV.  SUWA's Influence on Public Land Planning Policies
         A. The 2005 Forest Planning Rule Revisions
         B. The Proliferation of Categorical Exclusions
V.   Conclusion Appendix
Appendix

In 1976, Congress committed to land use planning on federal public lands by enacting both the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) (1) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA). (2) Signing NFMA into law, President Ford announced that the statute "reaffirms and further defines the concept of multiple use-sustained yield management and outlines policies and procedures for land management planning in the national forest system.... [T]his act guarantees the public full opportunity to participate in National Forest land and resource planning." (3) Actually, the Forest Service has engaged in some form of planning since the turn-of-the-century days of Gifford Pinchot, although the agency conducted its planning activities without significant congressional oversight or formal public involvement until the 1970s. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Norton V. SUWA and the Unraveling of Federal Public Land Planning
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.