Memo To: Margaret Beckett; From: Roger Liddle; Subject: Labour's Industrial Policy

By Liddle, Roger | New Statesman (1996), June 14, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Memo To: Margaret Beckett; From: Roger Liddle; Subject: Labour's Industrial Policy

Liddle, Roger, New Statesman (1996)

How will industrial policy be different under Labour? Not a bad question to ask in the week the government produces its third Competitiveness White Paper, reporting annual progress on Michael Heseltine's pledge to intervene on British industry's behalf before breakfast, lunch and dinner. But not perhaps the easiest question to answer in a week when Kim Howells' appeal to embrace competition is branded an unqualified endorsement of Conservative economics, and John Prescott's Regional Policy Commission makes a string of proposals for industrial micro-interventionism.

Be in no doubt that Kim Howells starts from the right place. "Fairer and more vigorous commercial competition" is the best available means of making our industry more successful and enabling companies to create jobs.

While the Conservatives mouth the language of competition, their commitment to promoting it has been at best patchy--just look at the green papers on strengthening competition laws, published in 1989 and 1990 but shelved until a few months ago when they were recycled as another half-baked consultative paper. Yet to some on the left of centre, to attack the government for failing to push more competition is almost countercultural-a brazenly opportunistic attempt to out-flank the Conservatives on the right.

This attitude of mind ignores an important strand in Labour's past. For evidence I took down from the bookshelf my battered, second-hand, 1951 edition of Facts and Figures for Socialists (an impressive 450-page briefing from the Labour Party's Research Department). The Attlee government was not ashamed of its anti-monopoly rules: no longer "will monopolies be able to operate behind closed doors. Anti-social restrictive practices will be exposed and prohibited."

The 1948 Act setting up the Monopolies Commission would, according to the then president of the board of trade, the young Harold Wilson, "put an end to boycotts, stop lists and discrimination; deal similarly with loyalty rebates, special discounts and other forms of preferential terms" and give the government powers to address "conditional sales and other forms of conditional supply". Almost half a century later, our competition law is still too weak to make the spirit of these pledges effective. A good example is the continued abuse of market dominance in the deregulated bus industry, despite the Office of Fair Trading's strenuous efforts.

That some Labour spokespeople feel embarrassed in propounding the virtues of competition is yet another example of the deplorable statist legacy of the 1970s and 1980s. Yes, markets fail. But in that period Labour used the existence of market failures of justify an obsessive attachment to wholly inappropriate forms of public intervention. Too often Labour forgot that governments can fail as well as markets. Well-intentioned industrial policies were frequently captured by interest groups and manipulated by business people who became more adept at lobbying governments for orders, favours and subventions than winning market share.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Memo To: Margaret Beckett; From: Roger Liddle; Subject: Labour's Industrial Policy


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?