Pet Peeves: Trademark Law and the Consumer Enjoyment of Brand Pet Parodies

By Petty, Ross D. | The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Fall 2008 | Go to article overview

Pet Peeves: Trademark Law and the Consumer Enjoyment of Brand Pet Parodies


Petty, Ross D., The Journal of Consumer Affairs


Consumers appear to appreciate trademark parodies, particularly those that are related to pets. In contrast, some trademark owners object to such parodies. However, as this article demonstrates, trademark law generally allows the sale of parody products unless these products copy the targeted trademarks too closely.

**********

Chewnel No. 5, Furcedes, Dog Perignon, Sniffany & Co., Grey Poopon chew toys, Dogiva treats, Miss Claybone and Timmy Holedigger pet perfumes, and T-shirts sporting the images of the "Big Dogs of Wrestling": Hollywood Hound Hogan, Bone Cold Steve Pawstin, Goldbark and the Underdogger, are just a few pet-related brand parodies, many of which have been challenged by brand owners who seem to dislike pets, lack a sense of humor, or both. This note analyzes both the legal bases used by these petulant plaintiffs and the potential for consumer harm resulting from these pet parodies. It suggests that in most cases, there is little potential for consumer harm, and in fact, these parodies suggest consumer popularity and even affection for these brands. Stretching trademark law to deprive consumers of pet parody products reduces the ability of pet-loving consumers to enjoy famous brands rather than improving the overall value of the brand to consumers.

THE CHEWY VUITON DECISION

A recent Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in a case involving Chewy Vuiton chew toys illustrates the latest judicial thinking concerning pet-related trademark parody products. The decision focuses on trademark infringement and dilution. It first finds that the product in question is indeed a trademark parody. The pet toy, pictured below, simultaneously presents a close imitation of the original trademark and a distinctively different representation that conveys a parody of the original. It conveys ".just enough of the original design to allow the consumer to appreciate the point of parody, but stop[s] well short of appropriating the entire mark" (Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Haute Diggio, Dog, LLC 2007). The inexpensive coarse dog chew toy pokes fun at the expensive and elegant Louis Vuitton handbags purchased by the rich and famous.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

However, finding the first product to be a proper parody of the second product's trademarks and trade dress does not resolve the lawsuit. The court then analyzes first the potential for consumer confusion regarding origin, sponsorship, or affiliation under trademark infringement and second analyzes whether the parody blurs the ability of the famous trademarks of the second product to uniquely identify a single product source, thereby causing dilution of the selling power that these marks have with consumers. The second legal theory, trademark dilution, explicitly provides for a fair use defense for trademark parodies that do not designate the source of goods (15 U.S.C. [section] 1125(c)(3)(A)(ii)). However, the court found that in this case, the parody was not being used as a designation of source so the defense did not apply. The court therefore examined both trademark infringement and trademark dilution by blurring using a multifactor analysis.

Based on empirical study of all US trademark decisions from 2000 to 2004, Beebe (2006) suggests that three factors are nearly always dispositive for infringement cases. First is the degree of similarity between the trademarks. Based on its finding of parody, the court noted that while the parody was necessarily somewhat similar to the original trademarks, it also had distinctive differences that made consumer confusion unlikely for trademark infringement and made it unlikely the parody would dilute the distinctiveness of Louis Vuitton's famous trademarks.

The second dispositive factor according to Beebe (2006) is the proximity of the goods. The court observed that Louis Vuitton did sell dog collars, leashes, and pet carriers but did not make toys. It characterized the Louis Vuitton's pet products as fashion accessories and quite different from inexpensive parody dog toys.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Pet Peeves: Trademark Law and the Consumer Enjoyment of Brand Pet Parodies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.