The Likelihood Ratio Test for Poisson versus Binomial Distributions

By Vu, H. T. V.; Maller, R. A. | Journal of the American Statistical Association, June 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Likelihood Ratio Test for Poisson versus Binomial Distributions

Vu, H. T. V., Maller, R. A., Journal of the American Statistical Association


Carroll and Lombard (1985) considered the problem of estimating the parameter N based on n independent success counts [x.sub.1],... ,[x.sub.n] from a binomial distribution with unknown parameters N and p. They extended earlier work by Olkin, Petkau, and Zidek (OPZ; 1981) on the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE's) of those parameters, by introducing new estimators of N based on integrating out p from the likelihood with respect to a beta distribution, yielding a beta-binomial distribution for the number of successes. The new estimators maximizing this likelihood compared favorably in mean squared error terms with the OPZ estimators. Hall (1994) gave an asymptotic analysis in which the true values of N and p tend to [infinity] and zero, but in such a way that their product tends to a nonzero limit. He showed that very heavy-tailed, nonnormal limit distributions, such as the Cauchy, can be obtained for the MLE and the method-of-moments estimators of N and p, but that the Carroll-Lombard estimator has a light-tailed asymptotic distribution with all moments finite.

Aitkin and Stasinopoulos (1989) considered the same problem with different methods of eliminating p, and obtained inferences about N that are dramatically different from those of OPZ (1981). The nub of the problem seems to be that the likelihood may be maximized on the boundary N = [infinity], suggesting a Poisson rather than a binomial distribution for the data. Data sets yielding a large estimate for N and a small estimate for p display "unstable" or "erratic" behavior of the MLE or the moments estimator, which the Carroll-Lombard method tries to overcome. Here we investigate a likelihood-based analysis of the data akin to that of Aitkin and Stasinopoulos (1989), which we think more clearly reveals its nature, free from assumptions about prior distributions and assumptions on N and/or p.

Suppose that [x.sub.1],..., [x.sub.n] are observations on n (iid) random variables [X.sub.1],..., [X.sub.n] whose common distribution is either binomial or Poisson. We will derive the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio (LR) test for the null hypothesis that the [X.sub.i] are Poisson against the alternative hypothesis that they are binomial. For this purpose, the true distribution of the [X.sub.i] is assumed to be Poisson, so we are required to test at the boundary N = [infinity] of the parameter space. Of course, we expect a nonstandard asymptotic distribution for the LR test in this case.

In the next section we state the main results, showing that an MLE [Mathematical Expression Omitted] of N exists and is unique with probability approaching 1 as n [approaches] [infinity], and deriving its asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis. (The proofs of these results are given in the Appendix.) In Section 3 we report on some simulations investigating how accurate the asymptotic distributions are in finite samples. It turns out that the rate of convergence of the log-likelihood ratio statistic to its asymptotic distribution is very slow, so we discuss the application of our method and compare it to alternative approaches.

Our likelihood analysis was called the profile likelihood approach by Aitkin and Stasinopoulos (1989). (They also suggested the use of a conditional likelihood, which we discuss in Sec. 4.) Our results suggest the following approach to the analysis of this kind of data. First, test the null hypothesis [H.sub.0] that the data are from a Poisson rather than a binomial distribution. If we accept [H.sub.0], then of course we do not attempt to estimate N but rather apply methods appropriate to Poisson data. On the other hand, if we reject [H.sub.0], then we can proceed to estimate N and draw inferences from the sample on this basis. We provide further details of this method in Section 4.


Consider n iid random variables [X.sub.1],..., [X.sub.n] whose common nondegenerate distribution F is either binomial or Poisson.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Likelihood Ratio Test for Poisson versus Binomial Distributions


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?