Holocene Humans at Pontnewydd and Cae Gronw Caves

By Aldhouse-Green, Stephen; Pettitt, Paul et al. | Antiquity, June 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Holocene Humans at Pontnewydd and Cae Gronw Caves


Aldhouse-Green, Stephen, Pettitt, Paul, Stringer, Christopher, Antiquity


The first well-documented examination of Pontnewydd Cave, in the Elwy Valley of northeast Wales, was conducted in the early 1870s by McKenny Hughes & Thomas (1874). Stone tools, recovered along with Pleistocene fauna, were compared to finds at Le Moustier and St Acheul, and a human molar tooth was discovered, looking 'quite as ancient as the rest'. Modern excavations, beginning in 1978, soon led to the discovery of hominid finds (Green 1981; Green et al. 1981; Green 1984; Green et al. 1989). Excavation was also conducted at two other near-by cave sites, Cae Gronw and Cefn (Green 1986; Green & Walker 1991).

A total of 17 hominid finds, securely stratified in Middle Pleistocene deposits, is known from Pontnewydd. Four other human specimens were recovered from contexts of 19th-20th-century date. To these may be added additional finds from Cae Gronw (Green 1986: 39). Three of these have now been dated using the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator (TABLE 1). Two specimens, PN2 and PN8, were considered possibly to have derived from the same individual; if so, the determination for PN2 should apply equally to PN8. At Cae Gronw cave, with a less complex but nonetheless comparable stratigraphic sequence to Pontnewydd, the only evidence of human activity comprises scattered human bones in derived contexts. The condition and context of the bones both suggested a Holocene age; one sample, an adult radius, was dated to verify this. Human remains, likely to be of Holocene age, are likewise known from Cefn but remain undated (Dawkins 1874: 159-61).

The uncalibrated determinations are expressed in radiocarbon years b.p. (before present - AD 1950) using the half-life of 5568 years. Isotopic fractionation has been corrected for, using the measured [[Delta].sup.13]C values quoted (to [+ or -]0-5 - 1.0 per mil relative to PDB) (Hedges et al. 1989; 1992). The samples dated at Oxford were demineralized, gelatinized and ion-exchanged in order to isolate the amino-acids, freeze dried and combusted. The [[Delta].sup.13]C ratios for each of the samples are within the expected range for British human skeletal material, and the yields of collagen and dateable carbon were good. Accordingly, no problems in chemistry were observed, and the resulting ages can be regarded as reliable.

Stringer's detailed study (1984: 162) of the Pontnewydd mandible was cautious: the metrical data would not 'exclude [it] from the morphological and metrical range of anatomically modern humans' and the tooth present 'can be matched much more readily among recent examples'. Again, he noted that the vertebra 'can be closely matched in recent large adult specimens'. In spite of this caution, a number of factors supported a Pleistocene attribution. The relative dating programme (Molleson 1984) concluded that the mandible and vertebra were 'of some antiquity' on the evidence of Uranium-308 concentration which, it was thought, could 'probably be used to distinguish Pleistocene from Recent material'. The molar PNS, it appeared, might be taurodont (Stringer in Green et al. 1989: 34-6). Other taurodont molars of undoubted Pleistocene age are known from the site, and this feature can be compared with the high incidence of taurodontism - a condition of enlargement of the pulp cavity and coalescence of the roots of molar teeth - among Neanderthal permanent molars (but the characteristic is also present among modern populations). And pre-19th-century Holocene material appeared completely absent (but, in 1995, a later Mesolithic microlith was recovered from the same recent context that yielded the mandible).

The direct dating of two of the four unstratified Pontnewydd samples has no implications for the study of the securely stratified Middle Pleistocene hominids, for no hypotheses were constructed on the basis of these finds. The recognition of this material as Holocene has archaeological effect, in limiting the distribution of hominid finds to one restricted area of the cave's East Passage, with a single find from the New Entrance.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Holocene Humans at Pontnewydd and Cae Gronw Caves
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?