In the Service of the United States: Comparative Mortality among African-American and White Troops in the Union Army

By Black, Andrew K. | The Journal of Negro History, Fall 1994 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

In the Service of the United States: Comparative Mortality among African-American and White Troops in the Union Army


Black, Andrew K., The Journal of Negro History


The glory of the Civil War lies firmly in the valor of the soldiers on both sides who fought and died for liberty as they saw it. Partially in response to their record, the literature on the War is extraordinarily voluminous. One group whose story has yet to be fully told is the African-Americans who fought for the Union. Men who served in the "United States Colored Corps" regiments did not experience the same conditions as other troops. Among a galaxy of differences, they suffered from disease at a considerably higher rate than white troops who served in the Union Army. There were, however, exceptions in reference to particular disorders and regions. The causes of the disparities between these two groups can be explained by their different environmental experiences, and included the locations where they served, the type of duty to which they were assigned, their medical experiences from the antebellum era, and the type of clinical treatment they received from the Union medical staff.(1)

This disparity has only been discussed at length in two works: Bell Irvin Wiley's The Life Of Billy Yank: The Common Soldier Of The Union, and Ira Berlin's Freedom: A Documentary History Of Emancipation 1861-1867; Series II: The Black Military Experience. Wiley's work is interesting, but limited; African-Americans appear only to provide context for the descriptions of white soldiers. Berlin's work, while much more effective, makes little attempt at specificity in regard to disease and region. All the different ingredients that caused the disparity between whites and blacks have yet to be addressed in a comprehensive manner. Consequently a full treatment of the most important aspects of this topic from a comparative viewpoint will be attempted as the subject of this study.(2)

In this most deadly of American wars Union fatalities from all causes exceeded 300,000 men. Of these, the distribution for white troops was 90,638 killed in battle or as a result of wounds, and 171,806 from disease. For black troops 3,331 were killed in battle or as a result of wounds, and 29,963 from disease respectively. In simple terms, white troops were twice as likely to die for reasons of ill-health as in battle, while black troops were almost ten times as likely to do so.(3)

The large amount of illness reported suggests that during the first two years of the war the average Union soldier (almost all of whom were white until late 1863) must have been ill much of the year. Indeed Union troops appear to have served in conditions of perpetual epidemic. Since the sick rate for black troops did not decrease (until March 1866), to less than that for white troops, it seems clear that the normal state of health within the "United States Colored Corps" was marginal at best.(4)

For Union troops as a whole the medical records were organized into Atlantic, Central, and Pacific regions, and segregated by race. The Atlantic zone extended from the East coast including Florida to the crest of the Appalachian mountain range. The Central zone started at the Appalachians and included all the territory up to the crest of the Rocky mountains. The Pacific zone included everything from the Rockies to the West coast, where the black presence was so small that no records were tabulated for them in that area. Of the three, by far the greatest mortality for all causes other than battle occurred in the Central region.(5)

The Mississippi river valley experienced an extraordinary number of epidemics both in the antebellum period and after which caused it to be the area of the nation with the greatest risk of ill-health from disease. For example, yellow fever alone, beginning with its first large scale outbreak in New Orleans in 1796, reappeared consistently until well into the twentieth century. In 1823, Natchez, which was located well up the river from the Crescent City suffered a very severe epidemic. As a result of this and similar incidents, Natchez would later establish one of the first quarantines on the river.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

In the Service of the United States: Comparative Mortality among African-American and White Troops in the Union Army
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?