The Influence of Kant on Christian Theology: A Debate about Human Dignity and Christian Personalism

By Jeffreys, Derek S. | Journal of Markets & Morality, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

The Influence of Kant on Christian Theology: A Debate about Human Dignity and Christian Personalism


Jeffreys, Derek S., Journal of Markets & Morality


Introduction

In recent writings, Robert Kraynak indicts modern liberalism, arguing that it is incompatible with the Christian faith. The modern language of human rights, he believes, undermines Christian virtues, producing a dangerous individualism. Kraynak suggests that constitutional monarchy comports best with Christianity but recognizes that it is unlikely to reappear on the historical scene anytime soon. He advises us, therefore, to embrace democracy on prudential grounds, tempering it by firmly distinguishing between spiritual and temporal realms.

Many scholars today raise challenges to democracy and question whether we ought to use human-rights language. I disagree with some of Kraynak's prudential judgments about these two issues, but they do not surprise me. (1) What disturbs me is how he uses Kantianism to caricature and undermine personalism. In this article, I argue that what he says about personalism is historically and philosophically simplistic. First, I outline Kraynak's account of Kantianism, noting how he ascribes it to personalists. Second, I show how important twentieth-century personalists explicitly reject Kant's metaphysics and epistemology. Third, I discuss how personalists use Kant's ethic carefully, fully aware of its dangers. Fourth, I argue that personalism originates not in Kantianism but in a metaphysic of being, which Kraynak never philosophically engages. By presenting it crudely, he is able to evade its powerful metaphysical and ethical challenge. Dismissing personalism, he develops a troubling argument about hierarchies of value within the human race that is metaphysically and ethically untenable.

Kraynak and Kantianism

For Kraynak, Kantianism is modernity's great villain, responsible for undermining traditional Christianity. Many historical factors produced modern liberalism and human rights, but Kraynak observes that "in the last analysis, I would argue that the decisive factor has been the intellectual movements growing out of the Enlightenment, especially the philosophy of freedom developed by Immanuel Kant." (2) Kantianism views people as moral agents claiming rights and determining their own destinies. It accepts the "distinction between Nature and Freedom, and locates the dignity of the person in the ability to create a human world outside of biological and physical nature through assertions of will." (3) For Kantians, persons possess inalienable rights protecting them from harm. Kraynak believes that modern Christians accept Kantianism uncritically, equate it with Christianity, and ignore Christianity's antidemocratic history. He urges us to reject Kantianism and to return to premodern understandings of the imago dei and community.

Kraynak believes that personalists are particularly guilty of endorsing Kantianism. Personalism, he maintains, is "a complex idea, but at its core one can find a synthesis of Thomas and Kant." (4) It embraces the Thomistic natural-law teaching that humans are rational and social animals longing for God but also accepts Kant's idea that they are acting and willing creatures with human rights. Kraynak finds this synthesis in Second Vatican Council documents, the new Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the writings of Jacques Maritain, John Courtney Murray, John Paul II, and others. For example, writing about Maritain, he notes that his "synthesis of traditional Thomistic natural law and modern human rights culminated in his theory of personalist democracy as the alternative to secularism and Marxism." (5) Discussing John Paul II, he remarks that his goal "is to develop a synthesis of Thomism and a Kantian version of phenomenology that tips the scales in favor of traditional natural-law duties over modern natural rights." (6) The pope and Maritain are only two of many personalists Kraynak claims endorse Kantianism.

Personalists Are Not Kantians

Undoubtedly, Kant has influenced modern thought. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Influence of Kant on Christian Theology: A Debate about Human Dignity and Christian Personalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.