Privatization of Higher Education Services: Propositional Pros and Cons

By Eddy, John Paul; Spaulding, Donald J. et al. | Education, Summer 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Privatization of Higher Education Services: Propositional Pros and Cons


Eddy, John Paul, Spaulding, Donald J., Murphy, Stan, Education


The decline in and the lack of state and federal monies for public higher education institutions, combined with the limited amount of finances available from private sources such as foundations and individuals, is forcing many universities and colleges to consider and implement a strategy of privatization of services and curricula as a method of saving money (Goldstein, Kempner, & Rush, 1993). Privatization, or outsourcing of services, ranges from food services (Eddy, 1977) to health clinics and hospitals (Bernstein, 1995), and counseling services (Phillips, Halstead, and Carpenter, 1996). The curriculum is even involved in the sense that some universities and professors are marketing complete courses on CD ROMs while some universities and colleges are considering expanding distance education to the point of offering degrees on-line (Eddy & Buchanon, 1996). Although not exactly a new approach, contracting student affairs services is of such importance that administrators should consider more than just the bottom line. Privatization may save costs, but it has advantages and disadvantages (Drum, 1994). Are administrators aware of and considering some of the more critical aspects of both? This article explores, in the form of propositions, several of the important advantages and disadvantages that should be thoroughly examined prior to implementation of the privatization strategy.

Propositional Advantages of Privatization

University and college officials considering and implementing the privatization of activities on their campuses should weigh the following propositions:

Proposition 1. The contractor or provider will provide the product, service, or operation at a price that will result in clear and long term cost savings, other factors bearing consideration include convenience to students and quality of the service or product. Is cost savings the only bottom line? Proposition 2. The administration will deflect criticism toward a specific contractor or provider of services should it become necessary to increase revenues as a result of higher costs. Will university or college officials lose cognizance of or ignore cost increases and simply blame a contractor or provider?

Proposition 3. Management skills within the contractor's supervisory hierarchy as well as at the site where a particular service is activated will result in higher quality service. Is the management structure in the private sector likely to be of greater competence than that hired and working within higher education? A reason for this managerial gap, should such exist, may be that universities and colleges internal managers lack capital incentives to make their entity client-friendly.

Proposition 4: The financial resources of a contractor or provider are likely to be greater than those of the university.

Thus, in such a situation, it is likely that the contractor or provider can minimize price by maximizing orders or services - cost savings via volume purchasing. Yet again, is bottom line the sole criterion for judgment of productivity?

Proposition 5. The regulations, rules, and red tape (3 R's for bureaucracy) of state laws controlling expenditures of state monies inhibits the potential of higher education institutions to maximize their dollars. Such restrictions are not imposed on private businesses. State Coordinating Boards of Higher Education may be interfering, through the imposition to supplement state laws, to the point of complicating the process of operating an efficient and effective operation (Eddy, 1995).

Propositional Disadvantages

Just as there are assumed advantages to privatization there are numerous, some directly contrary to the advantages, disadvantages to privatization. The following propositions are offered:

Proposition 6. Will the expected cost savings - the primary argument for privatization to the institution still be passed on to students, in the form of higher costs, in the long run even though such costs are not passed on to the institution?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Privatization of Higher Education Services: Propositional Pros and Cons
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?