Reconstruction and Development in Bosnia-Herzegovina

By Levitt, Gabriel; Wodynski, David | Public Management, September 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Reconstruction and Development in Bosnia-Herzegovina

Levitt, Gabriel, Wodynski, David, Public Management

Public Administration Assistance Is Key

While local government issues might not be the central focus of the massive international undertaking to rebuild the war-torn Bosnia-Herzegovina (BH), local government and federal programs in public administration are a critical component of the reconstruction and development efforts. As a result of the Dayton Peace Accord, such public management issues as fiscal federalism, intergovernmental finance, local government budgeting, and citizen participation are being addressed.

ICMA, through its Public Administration Assistance in Central and Eastern Europe contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), is playing a pivotal role in these areas of public management. This article summarizes the current political and military situation in BH; explains America's objectives, particularly as they relate to the development role of USAID; and describes how ICMA's work in Bosnia is helping to fulfill these objectives.

The 1995 Peace Accord

On November 21, 1995, after almost four years of fighting and failed negotiations, the warring parties in the Balkans signed the Dayton Peace Accord, ending the war in the former Yugoslavia. The Dayton agreement requires that the Bosnian Serbs, the Bosnian Muslims, and the Bosnian Croats agree to respect the territorial integrity of the former Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina. The nation state, in accordance with the Dayton Agreement, is composed of two political entities, the Muslim-Croat Federation (the Federation) and the Republika Srpska (RS), which consists mostly of Serbs.

Accomplishing the goals of a sustainable peace in the RBH and of fulfillment of the Dayton Accord's provisions will require a coherent strategy using military, political, and economic measures. As was the case with the Marshall Plan, the large-scale U.S. assistance program initiated to rebuild Western Europe after World War II, external assistance will greatly influence the future of the Balkan region.

The Implementation Force (IFOR) of 60,000 troops from NATO units and a contingent of Russian forces, including 18,000 American soldiers, has accomplished the central military objective of separating the combatants. However, the fulfillment of the Dayton provisions for a multi-ethnic society; freedom of movement; the right of refugees to return home; and a politically neutral environment, including free media, freedom of association, and bringing war criminals to justice, is seriously in question. IFOR's role is confined to limited military objectives that do not allow the troops to intervene in ways that might further the fulfillment of Dayton objectives.

Besides separating the combatants and thereby bringing an end to the violence, IFOR has facilitated the return of a small number of refugees, removed many illegal checkpoints, and arrested lesser criminals charged with war crimes. A debate rages as to whether or not IFOR should be more active in such areas as enforcing freedom of movement and bringing indicted war criminals to justice.

Working Toward a Unified Federation

Conflicting long-term goals among the antagonistic parties is the main problem facing the international program for rehabilitation and reconstruction. The fact that indicted war criminals Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic still wield power in the RS is both a functional and a symbolic obstacle that has cast a dark cloud over the region's future. While public statements still are forthcoming from the Bosnian Muslims, Croats, and Serbs that they are willing to build a multi-ethnic society, nationalist elements from each group dominate events and pursue divisive courses. Many observers predict that the elections, scheduled for September 14, 1996, will likely reinforce an ethnically divided region by entrenching nationalistic and ethnic political parties, rather than promoting the emergence of a multiethnic democracy.

The goal of creating a unified Federation of Bosnia-Herzegovina only can be achieved if the Muslims and Croats are truly willing to work together to make the Federation a success.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Reconstruction and Development in Bosnia-Herzegovina


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?