Grading Principals: Administrator Evaluations Come of Age

By Murphy, John A.; Pimentel, Susan | Phi Delta Kappan, September 1996 | Go to article overview

Grading Principals: Administrator Evaluations Come of Age


Murphy, John A., Pimentel, Susan, Phi Delta Kappan


Most school districts hold tight to a compliance mentality that rewards school staff members for following the rules. In those districts, competence is defined by a check list filled out by a central office manager after brief annual visits to classrooms. Mr. Murphy and Ms. Pimentel describe a better way - a results-based evaluation and profit-sharing system now in use in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina.

America's public schools have their evaluation and reward systems precisely backwards. Whether a matter of oversight or a sign of reluctance to change, public education is an enterprise in which competence and incompetence are largely ignored or noted without distinction. The most egregious example is paying the best employees the same as the worst. Whether you do a good job educating students or a bad job, you are treated the same. In fact, not much effort is put into figuring out who is and who isn't doing a good job.

Most school districts hold tight to a compliance mentality. Staff members are rewarded for following the rules. Few incentives urge risk-taking, improved schooling, or high academic outcomes for students. Competence remains defined by a check list filled out by a central office manager after brief annual visits to classrooms. Redefining learning in this nation requires redefining accountability and assessment - for both students and staff. To improve performance, we as a profession must join the modern corporate world and move to a well-conceived, results-based evaluation and profit-sharing system. We cannot allow an institution with a 50% failure rate to continue to operate unchallenged and unchanged for even one more year.

The good news is that no one wants to do a bad job. Educators want to do the job right; therefore, management must provide the right incentives. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) in North Carolina accepted this challenge, and early results have been good. The recipe for success is simple: reward staff members when they succeed with students, shape them up when they falter, and replace them when they fall to improve. The new system - a far cry from principal evaluation check lists - identifies and rewards educational excellence and ensures that principals get the assistance and support they need to be successful.

It is management by exception. The "good" principals breathe easy. As long as they produce good results, principals are home free. As long as their means to success are moral, legal, and ethical, how they choose to get the job done is up to them - no more looking over their shoulders, no more interference from central managers. For principals who fall to make the grade, the story changes: they don't - can't - escape attention or intervention. Like it or not, the full force of the central office descends on the failing school - and on its principal - in an effort to determine the source and scope of the problems. Principals report directly and often to the superintendent for guidance and direction. Plans for improvement are quickly put into motion. In short order, progress is forthcoming, or principals are relieved of their duty.

Build an Evaluation System with Bite

Before the switch, the ol' boys' network had a firm grasp on CMS. Control of the evaluation process rested with a handful of central office managers. The correlation between "making nice" to those in power and high ratings was all too certain. From a few personal snapshots, central managers determined whether or not, in their opinions, principals were making the grade. The evaluation tool - a holdover from the state - was a check list of process, administrative trivia, and personality traits. It is a matter of common sense that rules don't teach. If children don't learn, it doesn't much matter that regulations and guidelines are followed or even that the public's money is spent according to the law. Burdensome rules and formulas make staff members focus on the wrong things.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Grading Principals: Administrator Evaluations Come of Age
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.